Suppr超能文献

使用局部抗青光眼滴眼液联合治疗的原发性开角型青光眼患者的诊室眼压与24小时眼压之间的关系

Relation between office intraocular pressure and 24-hour intraocular pressure in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma treated with a combination of topical antiglaucoma eye drops.

作者信息

Nakakura Shunsuke, Nomura Yuya, Ataka Shinsuke, Shiraki Kunihiko

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Osaka City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2007 Mar;16(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31802ff85f.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the relation between office intraocular pressure (IOP) and 24-hour IOP in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) treated with 3 kinds of antiglaucoma eye drops.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects were 42 patients with POAG (71 eyes). All were being treated with 3 different topical antiglaucoma eye drops (latanoprost, beta-blocker, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor). Twenty-four-hour IOP values were obtained in the sitting position with a Goldmann applanation tonometer at 3-hour intervals.

RESULTS

Maximum 24-hour IOP (mean+/-SD) was 19.76+/-5.65 mm Hg, minimum 24-hour IOP was 13.06+/-4.75 mm Hg, mean 24-hour IOP was 16.30+/-4.90 mm Hg, and 24-hour IOP fluctuation was 6.70+/-2.81 mm Hg. Office IOP was 16.23+/-4.58 mm Hg, and office IOP fluctuation was 2.75+/-1.68 mm Hg. There was no significant difference between office IOP and mean 24-hour IOP (P=0.93). There was no correlation between office IOP and 24-hour IOP fluctuation (r=0.15; P=0.25) or between office IOP fluctuation and 24-hour IOP fluctuation (r=0.19; P=0.17). Maximum 24-hour IOP occurred during office hours in 22 eyes (33.8%). The frequency of maximum 24-hour IOP occurring during office hours was significantly less than that of minimum 24-hour IOP (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In POAG patients treated with 3 kinds of antiglaucoma eye drops, office IOP was similar to mean 24-hour IOP. However, it was difficult to estimate 24-hour IOP fluctuation and maximum 24-hour IOP on the basis of office IOP.

摘要

目的

确定使用3种抗青光眼滴眼液治疗的原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者的门诊眼压(IOP)与24小时眼压之间的关系。

患者与方法

研究对象为42例POAG患者(71只眼)。所有患者均接受3种不同的局部抗青光眼滴眼液(拉坦前列素、β受体阻滞剂和碳酸酐酶抑制剂)治疗。采用Goldmann压平眼压计,每隔3小时测量一次患者坐位时的24小时眼压值。

结果

24小时眼压最大值(均值±标准差)为19.76±5.65 mmHg,24小时眼压最小值为13.06±4.75 mmHg,24小时眼压均值为16.30±4.90 mmHg,24小时眼压波动值为6.70±2.81 mmHg。门诊眼压为16.23±4.58 mmHg,门诊眼压波动值为2.75±1.68 mmHg。门诊眼压与24小时眼压均值之间无显著差异(P = 0.93)。门诊眼压与24小时眼压波动之间无相关性(r = 0.15;P = 0.25),门诊眼压波动与24小时眼压波动之间也无相关性(r = 0.19;P = 0.17)。22只眼(33.8%)的24小时眼压最大值出现在门诊时间。24小时眼压最大值出现在门诊时间的频率显著低于24小时眼压最小值出现的频率(P < 0.001)。

结论

在使用3种抗青光眼滴眼液治疗的POAG患者中,门诊眼压与24小时眼压均值相似。然而,根据门诊眼压来估计24小时眼压波动和24小时眼压最大值是困难的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验