• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型枕颈后路内固定系统的生物力学评估

Biomechanical evaluation of new posterior occipitocervical instrumentation system.

作者信息

Currier Bradford L, Papagelopoulos Panayiotis J, Neale Patricia G, Andreshak John L, Hokari Yukitaka, Berglund Lawrence J, Larson Dirk R, Fisher Dean R, An Kai-Nan

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun(411):103-15. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000068760.86536.54.

DOI:10.1097/01.blo.0000068760.86536.54
PMID:12782865
Abstract

Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric occipitocervical specimens were randomized based on dual energy xray absorptiometry analysis of bone mineral density. The specimens were subjected to physiologic loads in a device that applied pure unconstrained flexion and extension, lateral bending, and axial rotational moments. The spines were tested intact and after major injury simulating transoral decompression of the dens. Biomechanical testing using pure moments with physiologic loads (< 1.5 N-m) was used to compare stability of posterior occipitocervical plates and screws, loop and cable construct, and new cervical rod and screw system. The injury created significantly less stiffness and greater range of motion and neutral zone at C1-C2 in flexion and extension and lateral bending and greater range of motion and neutral zone in axial rotation than the intact state. In lateral bending, the new rod construct had significantly lower mean values for range of motion than the loop and the plate construct. In axial rotation, the rod construct had a significantly higher mean value for stiffness than the other two devices and a significantly lower mean value for range of motion than the loop. The new rod-based instrumentation system for occipitocervical fixation is biomechanically equivalent or superior to a plate and screw construct and a rod and cable system.

摘要

根据骨密度的双能X线吸收测定分析,将12个新鲜冷冻的尸体枕颈标本进行随机分组。这些标本在一个施加单纯无约束屈伸、侧弯和轴向旋转力矩的装置中承受生理负荷。对脊柱进行完整状态下的测试以及模拟经口齿突减压的重大损伤后的测试。使用生理负荷(<1.5 N-m)下的纯力矩进行生物力学测试,以比较枕颈后路钢板和螺钉、袢与缆线结构以及新型颈椎棒和螺钉系统的稳定性。与完整状态相比,损伤在C1-C2节段的屈伸和侧弯中产生的刚度明显降低,屈伸和侧弯以及轴向旋转中的活动范围和中立区明显增大。在侧弯中,新型棒结构的活动范围平均值明显低于袢和钢板结构。在轴向旋转中,棒结构的刚度平均值明显高于其他两种装置,活动范围平均值明显低于袢。用于枕颈固定的新型基于棒的器械系统在生物力学上等同于或优于钢板和螺钉结构以及棒和缆线系统。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical evaluation of new posterior occipitocervical instrumentation system.新型枕颈后路内固定系统的生物力学评估
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun(411):103-15. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000068760.86536.54.
2
Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.两级颈椎锁定后路螺钉/棒与钩/棒技术的生物力学比较
Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.015. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
3
Craniocervical fixation with occipital condyle screws: biomechanical analysis of a novel technique.颅颈固定术:枕骨髁螺钉技术的生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9):931-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c16f9a.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of posterior screw fixation in cadaveric cervical spines.尸体颈椎后路螺钉固定的生物力学评估
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun(411):13-24. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000068359.47147.bd.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of parasagittal occipital plating: screw load sharing analysis.矢状旁枕骨钢板的生物力学评估:螺钉负荷分担分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 20;34(9):877-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318199692c.
6
Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.寰枢椎后路固定技术的生物力学比较:经寰枢关节螺钉和直接枕骨髁螺钉。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):E696-701. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182436669.
7
Biomechanics of occipitocervical fixation.枕颈固定的生物力学
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):755-61. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206366.20414.87.
8
Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.颈椎多节段椎体次全切除术后颈椎重建技术的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085344.22471.23.
9
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.使用前路腰骶固定螺钉钢板进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的生物力学评估:与单纯腰椎前路椎间融合术及在不稳定人体尸体模型中使用椎弓根螺钉进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2.
10
Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.四种C1至C2刚性固定技术的生物力学比较:前路经关节、后路经关节、C1至C2椎弓根以及C1至C2椎板间螺钉。
Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197222.05299.31.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical and Anatomical Validity of the Short Posterior Arch Screw.短后弓螺钉的生物力学及解剖学有效性
Neurospine. 2019 Jun;16(2):347-353. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836156.078. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
2
Anatomy and biomechanics of normal craniovertebral junction (a) and biomechanics of stabilization (b).正常颅颈交界区的解剖与生物力学(a)及稳定化的生物力学(b)。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Oct;24(10):1091-100. doi: 10.1007/s00381-008-0606-8. Epub 2008 Apr 4.