Shoepe Todd C, Stelzer Julian E, Garner Dena P, Widrick Jeffrey J
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jun;35(6):944-51. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000069756.17841.9E.
We compared the functional properties of muscle fibers from two groups of subjects that differed widely in their training history to investigate whether long-term resistance exercise alters the intrinsic contractile properties of skeletal muscle fibers.
Vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were obtained from six sedentary males (NT group, age = 23 +/- 1 yr) and six males who had participated in regular resistance exercise training over the preceding 7.6 +/- 1.6 yr (RT group, 22 +/- 1 yr). Chemically skinned muscle fiber segments were activated with a saturating free [Ca2+] to quantify fiber peak Ca2+-activated force (P(o)), unloaded shortening velocity (V(o)), and peak power. Fiber segment myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform content was identified by gel electrophoresis.
Slow and fast fibers from the RT group were larger in CSA and produced greater absolute P(o) and absolute peak power in comparison with fibers from the NT group. However, these differences were no longer evident after P(o) and peak power were normalized to fiber CSA and fiber volume, respectively. V(o)/fiber length was dependent on fiber MHC content but independent of training status.
Fiber hypertrophy was sufficient to account for intergroup differences in P(o) and peak power of slow and fast fibers. There was no evidence that the intrinsic contractility of slow or fast fibers, as evaluated by force, shortening velocity, and power normalized to the appropriate fiber dimensions, differed between RT and NT groups.
我们比较了两组训练经历差异很大的受试者的肌纤维功能特性,以研究长期抗阻运动是否会改变骨骼肌纤维的内在收缩特性。
从六名久坐不动的男性(NT组,年龄 = 23±1岁)和六名在过去7.6±1.6年中参加常规抗阻运动训练的男性(RT组,22±1岁)获取股外侧肌活检样本。用饱和游离[Ca2+]激活化学去膜肌纤维段,以量化纤维的峰值Ca2+激活力(P(o))、无负荷缩短速度(V(o))和峰值功率。通过凝胶电泳鉴定纤维段肌球蛋白重链(MHC)同工型含量。
与NT组的纤维相比,RT组的慢肌纤维和快肌纤维横截面积更大,产生的绝对P(o)和绝对峰值功率更高。然而,在将P(o)和峰值功率分别归一化至纤维横截面积和纤维体积后,这些差异不再明显。V(o)/纤维长度取决于纤维MHC含量,但与训练状态无关。
纤维肥大足以解释慢肌纤维和快肌纤维在P(o)和峰值功率方面的组间差异。没有证据表明,以归一化至适当纤维尺寸的力、缩短速度和功率评估,RT组和NT组的慢肌纤维或快肌纤维的内在收缩性存在差异。