Nance Walter E
Department of Human Genetics,Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9(2):109-19. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10067.
Deafness is an etiologically heterogeneous trait with many known genetic and environmental causes. Genetic factors account for at least half of all cases of profound congenital deafness, and can be classified by the mode of inheritance and the presence or absence of characteristic clinical features that may permit the diagnosis of a specific form of syndromic deafness. The identification of more than 120 independent genes for deafness has provided profound new insights into the pathophysiology of hearing, as well as many unexpected surprises. Although a large number of genes can clearly cause deafness, recessive mutations at a single locus, GJB2 or Connexin 26, account for more than half of all genetic cases in some, but not all populations. The high frequency may well be related to the greatly improved social, educational, and economic circumstances of the deaf that began with the introduction of sign language 300-400 years ago, along with a high frequency of marriages among the deaf in many countries. Similar mechanisms may account for the rapid fixation of genes for speech after the first mutations appeared 50,000-100,000 years ago. Molecular studies have shown that mutations involving several different loci may be the cause for the same form of syndromic deafness. Even within a single locus, different mutations can have profoundly different effects, leading to a different pattern of inheritance in some cases, or isolated hearing loss without the characteristic syndromic features in others. Most cases of genetic deafness result from mutations at a single locus, but an increasing number of examples are being recognized in which recessive mutations at two loci are involved. For example, digenic interactions are now known to be an important cause of deafness in individuals who carry a single mutation at the Connexin 26 locus along with a deletion involving the functionally related Connexin 30 locus. This mechanism complicates genetic evaluation and counseling, but provides a satisfying explanation for Connexin 26 heterozygotes who, for previously unknown reasons, are deaf. A specific genetic diagnosis can sometimes be of great clinical importance, as in the case of the mitochondrial A1555G mutation which causes gene carriers to be exquisitely sensitive to the ototoxic effects of aminoglycosides. This potentially preventable genetic-environmental interaction was the most common cause of genetic deafness in countries where these antibiotics were used indiscriminately in the past. Advances in genetic knowledge along with the use of cochlear implants have posed unique ethical dilemmas for society as well as the deaf community. Since most deaf children are born to hearing parents, it seems likely that deaf culture, and intermarriages among those born with deafness will recede during this century. Will future critics view this as one of the medical triumphs of the 21(st) Century, or as an egregious example of cultural genocide? On the other hand, genetics can provide empowering knowledge to the deaf community that for the first time can allow many deaf couples to know whether their children will be hearing or deaf even before they are conceived.
耳聋是一种病因学上具有异质性的特征,有许多已知的遗传和环境原因。遗传因素至少占所有重度先天性耳聋病例的一半,可根据遗传模式以及是否存在可能有助于诊断特定形式综合征性耳聋的特征性临床特征进行分类。超过120个独立的耳聋基因的鉴定为听力的病理生理学提供了深刻的新见解,同时也带来了许多意想不到的惊喜。虽然大量基因显然可导致耳聋,但在某些(并非所有)人群中,单个基因座GJB2或连接蛋白26的隐性突变占所有遗传病例的一半以上。这种高频率很可能与300 - 400年前随着手语的引入而带来的聋人社会、教育和经济状况的极大改善有关,同时也与许多国家聋人之间的高结婚率有关。类似的机制可能解释了5万 - 10万年前首次出现突变后语言基因的快速固定。分子研究表明,涉及几个不同基因座的突变可能是同一种综合征性耳聋形式的病因。即使在单个基因座内,不同的突变也可能产生截然不同的影响,在某些情况下导致不同的遗传模式,而在其他情况下则导致无特征性综合征特征的孤立性听力损失。大多数遗传性耳聋病例是由单个基因座的突变引起的,但越来越多的例子表明,两个基因座的隐性突变也参与其中。例如,现在已知双基因相互作用是携带连接蛋白26基因座单个突变以及涉及功能相关连接蛋白30基因座缺失的个体耳聋的重要原因。这种机制使遗传评估和咨询变得复杂,但为以前原因不明而耳聋的连接蛋白26杂合子提供了一个令人满意的解释。特定的基因诊断有时可能具有重要的临床意义,例如线粒体A1555G突变的情况,该突变使基因携带者对氨基糖苷类药物的耳毒性作用极为敏感。这种潜在可预防的基因 - 环境相互作用是过去这些抗生素被滥用的国家中遗传性耳聋最常见的原因。遗传知识的进步以及人工耳蜗的使用给社会和聋人社区带来了独特的伦理困境。由于大多数聋儿出生于听力正常的父母,在本世纪,聋人文化以及聋人之间的通婚似乎有可能减少。未来的批评者会将此视为21世纪的医学成就之一,还是视为文化灭绝的恶劣例子呢?另一方面,遗传学可以为聋人社区提供有力量的知识,首次使许多聋人夫妇甚至在孩子受孕之前就能知道他们的孩子将会听力正常还是耳聋。