Hurvitz Edward A, Leonard Christina, Ayyangar Rita, Nelson Virginia Simson
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pediatric Section, University of Michigan Medical Center/Charles Stewart Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0230, USA.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003 Jun;45(6):364-70. doi: 10.1017/s0012162203000707.
In order to assess patterns of usage of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in families of children with cerebral palsy (CP), 213 families with a child (0 to 18 years) with CP were recruited at the university medical center in Ann Arbor, MI, USA as part of a descriptive survey. Two hundred and thirty-five surveys were distributed. Mean age of the child was 8 years 6 months (SD 4y : 9mo) and 56% of the sample was male with 35% full-time independent ambulators, while the rest used an assistive device or a wheelchair. Fifty-four percent were in special education classrooms. Families were given a survey on functional status of the child with CP, CAM usage of the child and the parent, factors influencing the decision to use CAM, demographics, and clinical information. Of the families, 56%, used one or more CAM techniques. Massage therapy (25%) and aquatherapy (25%) were the most common. Children of families that used CAM were significantly younger (7y : 9mo, SD 4y : 7mo) than non-users (9y : 6mo, SD 4y : 6mo: t-test p < 0.01 two-tailed). Children with quadriplegic CP, with spasticity, and those who could not walk independently were more commonly exposed to CAM (Pearson's chi2 [P(chi)2] p = 0.01 two-tailed; for mobility, odds ratio [OR] of 2.5 with regression). Mothers with a college degree had a greater tendency to use CAM for their child than those without (P(chi)2 p = 0.01 two-tailed). Fathers of children who used CAM were older than fathers of those who did not (37y : 9mo versus 33y : 2mo, p = 0.04 two-tailed). There was no significant difference between groups for mother's age, father's education, income, or for population of home town. Parents who used CAM for themselves were more likely to try CAM for their child (70% versus 47%, OR 2.1), and were much more likely to be pleased with the outcome (71% versus 42%, OR 3.5). Child's age (younger), lack of independent mobility, and parental use of CAM were the most significant predictive factors identified via logistic regression.
为了评估脑瘫(CP)患儿家庭中补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用模式,作为一项描述性调查的一部分,在美国密歇根州安娜堡的大学医学中心招募了213个有0至18岁CP患儿的家庭。共发放了235份调查问卷。患儿的平均年龄为8岁6个月(标准差4岁9个月),样本中56%为男性,35%为全职独立行走者,其余使用辅助器械或轮椅。54%在特殊教育教室上课。向家庭发放了一份关于CP患儿功能状况、患儿及家长的CAM使用情况、影响使用CAM决策的因素、人口统计学信息和临床信息的调查问卷。在这些家庭中,56%使用了一种或多种CAM技术。按摩疗法(25%)和水疗(25%)最为常见。使用CAM的家庭中的患儿(7岁9个月,标准差4岁7个月)明显比未使用者(9岁6个月,标准差4岁6个月)年幼(双尾t检验p<0.01)。四肢瘫痪型CP患儿、有痉挛症状的患儿以及不能独立行走的患儿更常接触CAM(Pearson卡方检验[P(chi)2]双尾p = 0.01;就活动能力而言,回归分析的优势比[OR]为2.5)。拥有大学学位的母亲比没有大学学位的母亲更倾向于为孩子使用CAM(P(chi)2 p = 0.01双尾)。使用CAM的患儿的父亲比未使用的患儿的父亲年龄更大(37岁9个月对33岁2个月,p = 0.04双尾)。两组在母亲年龄、父亲教育程度、收入或家乡人口方面没有显著差异。自己使用CAM的家长更有可能为孩子尝试CAM(70%对47%,OR 2.1),并且对结果更满意的可能性要大得多(71%对42%,OR 3.5)。通过逻辑回归确定,患儿年龄(较小)、缺乏独立活动能力和家长使用CAM是最显著的预测因素。