Miller S M, Gynther B D, Heslop K R, Liu G B, Mitchell P B, Ngo T T, Pettigrew J D, Geffen L B
Cognitive Psychophysiology Laboratory, Central Clinical School, Vision Touch and Hearing Research Centre, University of Queensland, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Psychol Med. 2003 May;33(4):683-92. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703007475.
The rate of binocular rivalry has been reported to be slower in subjects with bipolar disorder than in controls when tested with drifting, vertical and horizontal gratings of high spatial frequency.
Here we assess the rate of binocular rivalry with stationary, vertical and horizontal gratings of low spatial frequency in 30 subjects with bipolar disorder, 30 age- and sex-matched controls, 18 subjects with schizophrenia and 18 subjects with major depression. Along with rivalry rate, the predominance of each of the rivaling images was assessed, as was the distribution of normalized rivalry intervals.
The bipolar group demonstrated significantly slower rivalry than the control, schizophrenia and major depression groups. The schizophrenia and major depression groups did not differ significantly from the control group. Predominance values did not differ according to diagnosis and the distribution of normalized rivalry intervals was well described by a gamma function in all groups.
The results provide further evidence that binocular rivalry is slow in bipolar disorder and demonstrate that rivalry predominance and the distribution of normalized rivalry intervals are not abnormal in bipolar disorder. It is also shown by comparison with previous work, that high strength stimuli more effectively distinguish bipolar from control subjects than low strength stimuli. The data on schizophrenia and major depression suggest the need for large-scale specificity trials. Further study is also required to assess genetic and pathophysiological factors as well as the potential effects of state, medication, and clinical and biological subtypes.
据报道,在使用高空间频率的漂移垂直和水平光栅进行测试时,双相情感障碍患者的双眼竞争率比对照组慢。
在此,我们评估了30名双相情感障碍患者、30名年龄和性别匹配的对照组、18名精神分裂症患者和18名重度抑郁症患者使用低空间频率的静止垂直和水平光栅时的双眼竞争率。除了竞争率,还评估了每个竞争图像的优势,以及标准化竞争间隔的分布。
双相情感障碍组的竞争明显比对照组、精神分裂症组和重度抑郁症组慢。精神分裂症组和重度抑郁症组与对照组没有显著差异。优势值根据诊断没有差异,并且在所有组中,标准化竞争间隔的分布都可以用伽马函数很好地描述。
结果提供了进一步的证据,表明双相情感障碍患者的双眼竞争较慢,并表明双相情感障碍患者的竞争优势和标准化竞争间隔的分布没有异常。与先前的研究相比还表明,高强度刺激比低强度刺激更有效地区分双相情感障碍患者和对照组。关于精神分裂症和重度抑郁症的数据表明需要进行大规模的特异性试验。还需要进一步研究来评估遗传和病理生理因素以及状态、药物治疗、临床和生物学亚型的潜在影响。