Suppr超能文献

牙本质区域对不同粘结系统粘结强度的影响。

Influence of dentinal regions on bond strengths of different adhesive systems.

作者信息

Ozer F, Unlü N, Sengun A

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Türkye.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jun;30(6):659-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01064.x.

Abstract

This in vitro study assessed comparatively the shear bond strengths of three composite resins, 3M Valux Plus (3MVP), Herculite (H), Clearfil AP-X (CAP-X), a polyacid modified composite resin Dyract (D), and a resin modified glass-ionomer materials Vitremer (V), to cervical and buccal dentine regions of extracted human molar teeth. Four different bonding systems, 3M ScotchBond Multipurpose (SB), Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (LB2), Opti Bond (OB), and Prime & Bond 2.1 (PB 2.1) were used with the manufacturer's respective composite and compomer materials. One hundred freshly extracted mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study. Flat buccal dentine surfaces were created on 50 teeth and cylindrical rods of the five materials were bonded to the dentine surfaces. For assessment of cervical bond strengths, the materials were bonded to mesial and distal enamel bordered occlusal dentinal surfaces of the remaining 50 teeth. The five groups of restorative procedures were applied as follows; Group 1: SB + 3MVP, Group 2: LB2 + CAP-X, Group 3: OB + H, Group 4: PB2.1 + D, Group 5: Vitremer primer (VP) VP + V. Each restorative procedure thus had 20 specimens (10 buccal + 10 cervical). After 24 h of water storage (37 degrees C), the specimens were tested on a Universal Testing machine in shear with a cross head speed of 0.5 mm min-1. The bond strength values were calculated in MPa and the results were evaluated statistically using Kruskal-Wallis one-way/anova and Mann-Whitney U-tests. It was found that the bond strengths of SB + 3MVP, LB2 + CAP-X and VP + V to buccal dentine surfaces were significantly stronger (P < 0.05) than those to the occluso-cervical dentine floors. When the bond strengths to the occluso-cervical dentine and buccal dentine surface were compared, there was no significant difference between the materials (P > 0.05). Vitremer was found the least successful adhesive material in terms of shear bond strength on both buccal and occluso-cervical dentine surfaces.

摘要

这项体外研究比较评估了三种复合树脂(3M Valux Plus,简称3MVP;Herculite,简称H;Clearfil AP-X,简称CAP-X)、一种聚酸改性复合树脂Dyract(简称D)以及一种树脂改性玻璃离子材料Vitremer(简称V)与拔除的人类磨牙的颈部和颊侧牙本质区域之间的剪切粘结强度。使用了四种不同的粘结系统,即3M ScotchBond Multipurpose(简称SB)、Clearfil Liner Bond 2(简称LB2)、Opti Bond(简称OB)和Prime & Bond 2.1(简称PB 2.1),分别与制造商提供的相应复合树脂和复合体材料配合使用。本研究选取了100颗新鲜拔除的下颌磨牙。在50颗牙齿上制备平坦的颊侧牙本质表面,并将五种材料的圆柱棒粘结到牙本质表面。为了评估颈部粘结强度,将材料粘结到其余50颗牙齿的近中及远中釉质边缘的咬合牙本质表面。五组修复程序如下应用:第1组:SB + 3MVP;第2组:LB2 + CAP-X;第3组:OB + H;第4组:PB2.1 + D;第5组:Vitremer底漆(简称VP)+ V。因此,每组修复程序有20个样本(10个颊侧 + 10个颈部)。在37摄氏度的水中储存24小时后,在万能试验机上以0.5毫米/分钟的十字头速度对样本进行剪切测试。粘结强度值以兆帕为单位计算,并使用Kruskal-Wallis单因素方差分析和Mann-Whitney U检验对结果进行统计学评估。结果发现,SB + 3MVP、LB2 + CAP-X和VP + V与颊侧牙本质表面的粘结强度显著强于(P < 0.05)与咬合-颈部牙本质表面的粘结强度。当比较与咬合-颈部牙本质和颊侧牙本质表面的粘结强度时,各材料之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。就颊侧和咬合-颈部牙本质表面的剪切粘结强度而言,Vitremer被发现是最不成功的粘结材料。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验