Küntscher Markus V, Czermak Christoph, Blome-Eberwein Sigrid, Dacho Andreas, Germann Günter
Department of Plastic & Hand Surgery, Burn Center, BG, Trauma Center Ludwigshafen and Plastic & Hand Surgery, The University of Heidelberg, Germany.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003 May-Jun;24(3):142-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000066788.69818.65.
The purpose of this study was to compare the approximated values for intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and extravascular lung water (EVLW) obtained from a single indicator dilution to the exact data measured by double-indicator dilution. Eighteen patients with an average TBSA of 46.3% (range, 26 to 67%) and an average abbreviated burn severity index of 8.7 (range, 7 to 11) were included into a intraindividual comparative prospective study over a 20-month period. The COLD Z-021 system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) was used to obtain both the exact measurements, as well as the estimated values for ITBV and EVLW. Two hundred ninety intraindividually comparative measurements were performed during the first 4 days after the burn injury. A good correlation between both techniques was shown for ITBVI (0.77; P <.01) for the overall measurements. However, the overall bias demonstrated a standard deviation higher than the mean value (-87.4 +/- 136 ml/m2), and precision for the estimated values for ITBVI was poor (-491 to 783 ml/m2). Additional analyses demonstrated a poor but significant correlation for low states of ITBV (r =.37; P <.01), but no significant correlations were found between the techniques for normal and high ITBV states. Thus, the approximated ITBV obtained from single thermodilution should not be used to guide volume therapy in major burn resuscitation. Furthermore, the EVLW is neither suitable for diagnostic use nor for therapeutic decisions because it is calculated on the basis of the poorly estimated values for ITBV in single thermodilution. Transcardiopulmonary single thermodilution is not suitable to assess intrathoracic blood volume and extravascular lung water in burn shock. However, the method is suitable to assess cardiac output and its derived parameters in burn resuscitation as shown in previous studies. It still must be proven whether the exactly measured ITBV obtained from transcardiopulmonary double-indicator dilution is superior to the commonly used parameters to guide major burn resuscitation.
本研究的目的是将通过单指示剂稀释法获得的胸腔内血容量(ITBV)和血管外肺水(EVLW)的近似值与双指示剂稀释法测量的精确数据进行比较。18例患者纳入一项个体内比较性前瞻性研究,研究为期20个月,平均烧伤总面积(TBSA)为46.3%(范围26%至67%),平均简化烧伤严重程度指数为8.7(范围7至11)。使用COLD Z - 021系统(德国慕尼黑普ulsion医疗系统公司)获取ITBV和EVLW的精确测量值以及估计值。在烧伤后第1个4天内进行了290次个体内比较测量。总体测量中,两种技术对于ITBVI显示出良好的相关性(0.77;P <.01)。然而,总体偏差显示标准差高于平均值(-87.4±136 ml/m²),ITBVI估计值的精密度较差(-491至783 ml/m²)。进一步分析显示,ITBV处于低水平时相关性较差但具有显著性(r =.37;P <.01),而在ITBV处于正常和高水平时,两种技术之间未发现显著相关性。因此,单热稀释法获得的近似ITBV不应在大面积烧伤复苏中用于指导容量治疗。此外,EVLW既不适合用于诊断,也不适合用于治疗决策,因为它是基于单热稀释法中ITBV估计值较差的情况下计算得出的。经心肺单热稀释法不适用于评估烧伤休克时的胸腔内血容量和血管外肺水。然而,如先前研究所示,该方法适用于评估烧伤复苏时的心输出量及其衍生参数。经心肺双指示剂稀释法获得的精确测量的ITBV是否优于常用参数以指导大面积烧伤复苏仍有待证实。