Beavis P, Lundie S
Centre for Water and Waste Technology, University of NSW, Sydney.
Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(7-8):109-16.
In the wastewater industry, decision-makers lack access to an environmental tool that can assist in further informing the non-financial analysis of a system. Such a tool should incorporate impacts beyond the effluent quality and look at the supporting processes of a plant as well as plant specific operations. Life Cycle Assessment can provide the means to fill a gap in pertinent information towards more sustainable decision-making. The project "Best Practice LCA in the Wastewater Industry" is commissioned by the CRC for Waste Management and Pollution Control at UNSW with representatives from Sydney Water Corporation (SWC), NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation and the NSW Department of Public Works. Two case studies were researched to provide a post-implementation review of changes in wastewater. Case study 1: The conversion from chlorine gas to hypochlorite and UV disinfection has been completed for several inland wastewater plants at SWC. A review of operational data for each of the options has been incorporated into an LCA of each technology. Under efficient dosing conditions, disinfection with the hypochlorite system has the minimum environmental impact. Case study 2 deals with the conversion from anaerobic to aerobic digestion. Aerobic digestion minimises release of nutrients into a sidestream to be further treated in the plant. However conversion results in more biosolids production and higher electricity requirements. This study includes a consideration of the environmental impacts of biosolids production and application. On the basis of the extended boundary including consideration of reflux composition, energy requirements and biosolids quality to potentially offset fertiliser production, anaerobic digestion performs best in 6 out of 9 impact categories. These results suggest that environmental LCA has a role in informing decision-making on unit process and treatment train selection by quantifying aspects on non-financial criteria. Also, improvement potentials are foreshadowed but not detailed.
在废水处理行业,决策者缺乏一种能够辅助进一步完善系统非财务分析的环境工具。这样一种工具应纳入超出出水水质的影响因素,并考察工厂的辅助流程以及特定工厂的运营情况。生命周期评估能够提供一种手段,填补相关信息方面的空白,以实现更可持续的决策。“废水处理行业最佳实践生命周期评估”项目由新南威尔士大学废物管理与污染控制合作研究中心委托开展,悉尼水务公司(SWC)、新南威尔士州土地与水资源保护部以及新南威尔士州公共工程部均有代表参与。研究了两个案例,以对废水处理的变化进行实施后审查。案例研究1:SWC的几家内陆废水处理厂已完成从氯气消毒向次氯酸盐和紫外线消毒的转换。对每个方案的运行数据审查已纳入每种技术的生命周期评估。在高效投加条件下,次氯酸盐系统消毒对环境的影响最小。案例研究2涉及从厌氧消化向好氧消化的转换。好氧消化可将营养物质释放到侧流中的量降至最低,以便在工厂中进一步处理。然而,转换会导致更多生物固体产生和更高的电力需求。本研究考虑了生物固体产生和应用的环境影响。基于扩展边界,包括考虑回流成分、能源需求和生物固体质量以潜在抵消肥料生产,厌氧消化在9个影响类别中的6个类别中表现最佳。这些结果表明,环境生命周期评估通过量化非财务标准方面的内容,在为单元工艺和处理流程选择的决策提供信息方面发挥着作用。此外,虽然预示了改进潜力,但未详细说明。