Robinson E A, Gillespie R J
Department of Chemistry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M1, Canada.
Inorg Chem. 2003 Jun 16;42(12):3865-72. doi: 10.1021/ic030024h.
This paper discusses the geometry of the fluorides of the nonmetals of periods 3, 4, and 5 in terms of the ligand close packing (LCP) model according to which molecular geometry is determined primarily by ligand-ligand repulsions (Pauli closed shell repulsions) rather than by the bonding and lone pair Pauli repulsions of the VSEPR model. The LCP model becomes the dominant factor in determing geometry when the ligands are sufficiently crowded that they may be regarded as essentially incompressible. Ligand close packing is a modification of the VSEPR model in which ligand-ligand repulsion (Pauli closed shell repulsion) is given more emphasis than bonding and nonbonding electron pair Pauli repulsion. The nonmetals of period 3 are large enough to form octahedral six coordinated molecules in which the ligands are close packed. The larger nonmetals of period 4 also have a maximum coordination number of six and an octahedral geometry although the ligands are not close packed. Ligand radii derived from the interligand distances in the molecules of period 3 depend only on the charge of the fluorine ligands and are consistent with the previously derived radii obtained from the fluorides of the close packed tetrahedral molecules of the period 2 elements. Although the ligands in the molecules of the period 4 nonmetals are not close packed, these elements are not large enough to form molecules with a higher coordination number. However, the larger period 5 nonmetals may have coordination numbers of seven and eight. The seven coordinated molecules have a pentagonal bipyramidal geometry in which the equatorial ligands are close packed. The eight coordinated molecules have a square antiprism geometry, which is not a close packed geometry although the fluorine interligand distances are only a little larger than expected for close packing. The difference between the axial and equatorial bond lengths in the trigonal bipyramidal pentafluorides and the pentagonal bipyramidal pentafluorides can be understood on the basis of ligand close packing. Ligand packing prevents the lone pair in AF(6)E molecules from fully entering the valence shell and thereby exerting its full stereochemical effect so that these molecules have a C(3)(v)() distorted octahedral geometry rather than a geometry based on pentagonal bipyramidal seven coordination.
本文根据配体紧密堆积(LCP)模型讨论了第3、4和5周期非金属元素氟化物的几何结构。根据该模型,分子几何结构主要由配体-配体排斥作用(泡利闭壳层排斥作用)决定,而非价层电子对互斥理论(VSEPR)模型中的键合和孤对电子泡利排斥作用。当配体足够拥挤以至于可被视为基本不可压缩时,LCP模型成为决定几何结构的主导因素。配体紧密堆积是对VSEPR模型的一种修正,其中配体-配体排斥作用(泡利闭壳层排斥作用)比键合和非键合电子对泡利排斥作用更受重视。第3周期的非金属元素足够大,能够形成配体紧密堆积的八面体六配位分子。第4周期较大的非金属元素也具有最大配位数6和八面体几何结构,尽管配体并非紧密堆积。从第3周期分子中的配体间距得出的配体半径仅取决于氟配体的电荷,并且与先前从第2周期元素紧密堆积的四面体分子的氟化物中得出的半径一致。尽管第4周期非金属元素分子中的配体并非紧密堆积,但这些元素不够大,无法形成具有更高配位数的分子。然而,第5周期较大的非金属元素可能具有7配位和8配位。7配位分子具有五角双锥几何结构,其中赤道平面上的配体紧密堆积。8配位分子具有四方反棱柱几何结构,尽管氟配体间距离仅比紧密堆积预期值略大,但这并非紧密堆积几何结构。三角双锥五氟化物和五角双锥五氟化物中轴向和赤道键长的差异可基于配体紧密堆积来理解。配体堆积阻止了AF(6)E分子中的孤对电子完全进入价层,从而无法发挥其全部立体化学效应,因此这些分子具有C(3)(v)()扭曲八面体几何结构,而非基于五角双锥七配位的几何结构。