Voyvodic Frank, Rieger Nicholas A, Skinner Sarah, Schloithe Ann C, Saccone Gino T, Sage Michael R, Wattchow David A
Division of Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Jun;46(6):735-41. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6650-x.
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the extent of anal sphincter muscle injury as graded at endosonography correlates with the degree of functional impairment.
Three hundred and thirty adults presenting for evaluation of fecal incontinence were recruited. Ultrasound was performed with a 7.5-MHz radial rotating axial endoprobe in the left lateral position. Anal sphincter muscle tears were graded on the basis of the degree of circumferential involvement (< or >25 percent) and by an assessment of the superoinferior longitudinal extent of an external anal sphincter tear. Muscles that demonstrated multiple tears, poor visualization, or fragmentation were classed as fragmented. Sphincter injuries were correlated with basal and squeeze pressures at manometry, pudendal nerve terminal latencies, and the severity of symptoms using the Parks-Browning clinical score.
Patients with an intact external anal sphincter had a higher squeeze pressure (mean, 162.6 cm H(2)O) than those with a partial- (mean, 125.7 cm H(2)O) or full-length tear (mean, 124.9 cm H(2)O; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in squeeze pressure between those with partial- vs. full-length external anal sphincter tears nor between circumference tears < or >25 percent. Basal pressure was significantly lower in those with a full-length external anal sphincter tear (47.8 cm H(2)O) vs. an intact external anal sphincter (65.7 cm H(2)O; P < 0.001). The basal pressure in those with an intact internal anal sphincter was not significantly different from those with clearly defined internal anal sphincter tears, and the degree of circumferential involvement was also not important in this regard. However, those with a fragmented internal anal sphincter had a significantly lower basal pressure than other subgroups of internal anal sphincter injuries (P < 0.001). There was no association between external or internal anal sphincter status and the mean pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, suggesting the patient groups were neurologically similar. There was no significant association between external or internal anal sphincter status and the severity of reported symptoms.
Correlations between the presence or absence of muscle tears and reduced manometric function have been identified. Further grading of tears was of less importance. No relationship between muscle injuries and the severity of clinical symptoms could be elicited.
本研究旨在验证以下假设,即经腔内超声检查分级的肛门括约肌损伤程度与功能损害程度相关。
招募了330名因大便失禁前来评估的成年人。采用7.5MHz径向旋转轴向腔内探头在左侧卧位进行超声检查。根据圆周受累程度(<或>25%)以及对肛门外括约肌撕裂的上下纵向范围评估对肛门括约肌撕裂进行分级。显示多处撕裂、可视化差或破碎的肌肉被归类为破碎。使用帕克 - 布朗宁临床评分将括约肌损伤与测压时的基础压力和收缩压力、阴部神经终末潜伏期以及症状严重程度进行关联分析。
肛门外括约肌完整的患者收缩压力(平均162.6 cm H₂O)高于部分撕裂(平均125.7 cm H₂O)或全长撕裂(平均124.9 cm H₂O)的患者(P < 0.0001)。肛门外括约肌部分撕裂与全长撕裂患者之间的收缩压力以及圆周撕裂<或>25%之间均无显著差异。肛门外括约肌全长撕裂患者的基础压力(47.8 cm H₂O)显著低于肛门外括约肌完整的患者(65.7 cm H₂O;P < 0.001)。肛门内括约肌完整的患者与明确的肛门内括约肌撕裂患者之间的基础压力无显著差异,并且在这方面圆周受累程度也不重要。然而,肛门内括约肌破碎的患者基础压力显著低于肛门内括约肌损伤的其他亚组(P < 0.001)。肛门外或内括约肌状态与平均阴部神经终末运动潜伏期之间无关联,表明各患者组在神经方面相似。肛门外或内括约肌状态与报告症状的严重程度之间无显著关联。
已确定肌肉撕裂的有无与测压功能降低之间存在相关性。进一步对撕裂进行分级的重要性较低。未发现肌肉损伤与临床症状严重程度之间存在关联。