Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Apr;13(4):449-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02208.x.
Anal sphincter anatomy on two-dimensional endoanal -ultrasonography (EUS) does not always correlate with the clinical data. The purpose of this study was to determine whether three-dimensional (3D) measurements yield a better correlation.
The study group included consecutive patients who underwent 3D EUS for faecal incontinence over a 2-year period. The medical charts were reviewed for Cleveland Clinic Foundation Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) score and manometric pressures. Endoanal ultrasonographic images were reviewed for the presence of an external anal sphincter (EAS) defect and its extent, as determined by the radial angle, length in the sagittal plane and percentage volume deficit. Correlational analyses were performed between the clinical and imaging data.
Sixty-one patients of median age 53 years (range 15-82) were evaluated. Thirty-two patients had either a complete (17) or partial (15) EAS defect, and 29 patients had an intact sphincter. The CCF-FI scores were similar in patients with and without an EAS defect (12.5 ± 5.6 and 11.4 ± 5.5, respectively). The intact-sphincter group had a significantly greater EAS length (3 ± 0.4 vs 2 ± 0.62 cm, P = 0.02) and higher mean maximal squeeze pressure (MMSP; 99.7 ± 52.6 vs 66.9 ± 52.9 mmHg, P = 0.009). There were no statistically significant correlations between MMSP, CCF-FI score and EAS status on 3D EUS. Mean percentage volume of the defect was similar in patients with complete and partial tears (14.5 ± 5.5 and 17.5 ± 7.2%, P = 0.25) and showed no correlation with physiological tests or symptom scores.
Improvements in external anal sphincter imaging have not yielded a better association with the clinical findings. The lack of clinical differences between patients with different EAS tears may reflect their similar volumetric defects.
二维肛门内超声(EUS)对肛门括约肌的解剖学评估并不总是与临床数据相关。本研究旨在确定三维(3D)测量是否能更好地相关。
研究组纳入了在 2 年内接受 3D EUS 检查治疗粪便失禁的连续患者。回顾了克利夫兰诊所基金会粪便失禁(CCF-FI)评分和测压的病历。肛门内超声图像评估了外括约肌(EAS)缺陷及其程度,通过放射角、矢状面长度和体积缺损百分比来确定。对临床和影像学数据进行了相关性分析。
共评估了 61 名中位年龄为 53 岁(范围 15-82)的患者。32 名患者有完全(17 名)或部分(15 名)EAS 缺陷,29 名患者有完整的括约肌。EAS 缺陷患者的 CCF-FI 评分相似(分别为 12.5 ± 5.6 和 11.4 ± 5.5)。完整括约肌组的 EAS 长度明显更长(3 ± 0.4 与 2 ± 0.62cm,P = 0.02),最大收缩压(MMSP)更高(99.7 ± 52.6 与 66.9 ± 52.9mmHg,P = 0.009)。MMSP、CCF-FI 评分与 3D EUS 上 EAS 状态之间无统计学显著相关性。完全撕裂和部分撕裂患者的缺陷平均体积百分比相似(分别为 14.5 ± 5.5%和 17.5 ± 7.2%,P = 0.25),与生理测试或症状评分无相关性。
外括约肌成像的改善并没有与临床发现更好地相关。不同 EAS 撕裂患者之间缺乏临床差异可能反映了他们相似的容积缺陷。