Berg M, Fröhlig G, Schwerdt H, Becker R, Schieffer H
Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Innere Medizin III, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1880-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02986.x.
Automatic adaptation of the atrial sensitivity was evaluated in 18 patients with dual chamber pacemakers (Intermedics, Inc., Relay) in the unipolar mode. After atrial sensitivity was stabilized in the upright position, patients underwent a 1.0 W/kg body weight exercise for 5 minutes. A 24-hour Holter ECG was recorded, and the maximum and minimum atrial sensitivity values reached were stored in the memory of the pulse generator. In a second series of 12 patients, Holter ECGs were recorded twice, starting with the same sensitivity but with automatic adaptation alternately switched "on" or "off." Results of the exercise test: mean atrial sensitivity declined from 2.30 +/- 0.77 mV to 2.03 +/- 0.68 mV. There was no change in five patients, a slight increase in two patients, and lowering of the atrial sensitivity was observed in 11 patients, the difference ranging from 0.2 to 1.0 mV. A total of two P waves in two patients were missed by the atrial amplifier. The minimum and maximum sensitivity reached during Holter monitoring averaged 2.31 +/- 0.67 mV versus 1.72 +/- 0.71 mV (difference 0-1.7 mV). Normal pacemaker function was found in six patients, including one patient without any intrinsic atrial activity. Malsensing of less than five P waves occurred in four patients. More than 50 sensing defects resulted from ectopic atrial beats (four patients). We observed atrial oversensing in three cases; one patient showed atrial over- and undersensing. The comparison between fixed and variable sensitivity did not reveal any superiority of automatic adaptation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在18例使用单极模式双腔起搏器(Intermedics公司,Relay)的患者中评估心房敏感性的自动适应性。在直立位心房敏感性稳定后,患者进行5分钟1.0W/kg体重的运动。记录24小时动态心电图,达到的最大和最小心房敏感性值存储在脉冲发生器的存储器中。在第二组12例患者中,动态心电图记录两次,起始敏感性相同,但自动适应性交替打开或关闭。运动试验结果:平均心房敏感性从2.30±0.77mV降至2.03±0.68mV。5例患者无变化,2例患者略有增加,11例患者心房敏感性降低,差异范围为0.2至1.0mV。心房放大器漏检了2例患者的总共2个P波。动态监测期间达到的最小和最大敏感性平均为2.31±0.67mV对1.72±0.71mV(差异0 - 1.7mV)。6例患者起搏功能正常,包括1例无任何固有心房活动的患者。4例患者出现少于5个P波的感知不良。4例患者因房性早搏出现超过50次感知缺陷。我们观察到3例心房感知过度;1例患者出现心房感知过度和感知不足。固定敏感性和可变敏感性之间的比较未显示自动适应性有任何优势。(摘要截短于250字)