O'Neill Marie S, Zanobetti Antonella, Schwartz Joel
Environmental Epidemiology Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jun 15;157(12):1074-82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg096.
This paper examines effect modification of heat- and cold-related mortality in seven US cities in 1986-1993. City-specific Poisson regression analyses of daily noninjury mortality were fit with predictors of mean daily apparent temperature (a construct reflecting physiologic effects of temperature and humidity), time, barometric pressure, day of the week, and particulate matter less than 10 micro m in aerodynamic diameter. Percentage change in mortality was calculated at 29 degrees C apparent temperature (lag 0) and at -5 degrees C (mean of lags 1, 2, and 3) relative to 15 degrees C. Separate models were fit to death counts stratified by age, race, gender, education, and place of death. Effect estimates were combined across cities, treating city as a random effect. Deaths among Blacks compared with Whites, deaths among the less educated, and deaths outside a hospital were more strongly associated with hot and cold temperatures, but gender made no difference. Stronger cold associations were found for those less than age 65 years, but heat effects did not vary by age. The strongest effect modifier was place of death for heat, with out-of-hospital effects more than five times greater than in-hospital deaths, supporting the biologic plausibility of the associations. Place of death, race, and educational attainment indicate vulnerability to temperature-related mortality, reflecting inequities in health impacts related to climate change.
本文研究了1986 - 1993年美国七个城市与热和冷相关的死亡率的效应修正情况。对每日非伤害性死亡率进行特定城市的泊松回归分析,模型中纳入的预测变量有日平均表观温度(一种反映温度和湿度生理效应的指标)、时间、气压、星期几以及空气动力学直径小于10微米的颗粒物。相对于15摄氏度,计算表观温度为29摄氏度(滞后0)和 - 5摄氏度(滞后1、2和3的平均值)时死亡率的百分比变化。针对按年龄、种族、性别、教育程度和死亡地点分层的死亡人数分别拟合模型。将各城市的效应估计值合并,把城市视为随机效应。与白人相比,黑人的死亡、受教育程度较低者的死亡以及院外死亡与炎热和寒冷温度的关联更强,但性别差异不明显。65岁以下人群与寒冷的关联更强,但热效应不随年龄变化。热效应的最强效应修饰因素是死亡地点,院外死亡的效应比院内死亡大五倍多,这支持了这些关联的生物学合理性。死亡地点、种族和教育程度表明了对与温度相关死亡率的脆弱性,反映了与气候变化相关的健康影响方面的不平等。