van der Meer Irene M, de Maat Moniek P M, Kiliaan Amanda J, van der Kuip Deirdre A M, Hofman Albert, Witteman Jacqueline C M
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jun 9;163(11):1323-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.11.1323.
Epidemiologic studies have shown that C-reactive protein (CRP) is a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Whether routine measurement of CRP has a role in the prediction of future coronary disease in everyday clinical practice has not yet been investigated.
Within the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort study of 7983 men and women 55 years and older, we conducted a nested case-control study to investigate the value of CRP in coronary disease prediction. Data are based on 157 participants who experienced a myocardial infarction during follow-up and 500 randomly selected controls. High-sensitivity CRP and traditional cardiovascular risk factors were measured at baseline.
The age- and sex-adjusted relative risk of myocardial infarction for subjects in the highest quartile of the population distribution of CRP compared with the lowest quartile was 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.4). After additional adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, the increase in risk largely disappeared (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-2.2). Adding CRP to a coronary disease risk function based on risk factors that are routinely assessed in clinical practice or to the Framingham risk function did not improve the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of these risk functions. Sensitivity and specificity of both risk functions, computed after dichotomizing the estimated disease probabilities using prespecified cutoff points, hardly improved when CRP was added.
Measurement of CRP in elderly people has no additional value in coronary disease risk prediction when traditional cardiovascular risk factors are known.
流行病学研究表明,C反应蛋白(CRP)是冠心病的一个危险因素。在日常临床实践中,常规检测CRP对预测未来冠心病是否有作用尚未得到研究。
在鹿特丹研究中,这是一项针对7983名55岁及以上男女的基于人群的队列研究,我们进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,以调查CRP在冠心病预测中的价值。数据基于157名在随访期间发生心肌梗死的参与者和500名随机选择的对照。在基线时测量高敏CRP和传统心血管危险因素。
与CRP人群分布最低四分位数相比,CRP人群分布最高四分位数的受试者经年龄和性别调整后的心肌梗死相对风险为2.0(95%置信区间,1.1 - 3.4)。在进一步调整传统心血管危险因素后,风险增加基本消失(比值比,1.2;95%置信区间,0.6 - 2.2)。将CRP添加到基于临床实践中常规评估的危险因素的冠心病风险函数或弗雷明汉风险函数中,并未改善这些风险函数的受试者工作特征曲线下面积。当使用预先设定的临界点将估计的疾病概率二分法计算后,添加CRP时,这两种风险函数的敏感性和特异性几乎没有改善。
当已知传统心血管危险因素时,对老年人检测CRP在冠心病风险预测中没有额外价值。