Kivela Tero, Polkunen Marja-Liisa
Ocular Oncology Service and Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;121(6):881-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.6.881.
Cancer in a young child is unusual and has always aroused curiosity. Proptosis and an enormous, rapidly growing unilateral tumor in a 3-year-old boy prompted Pieter Pauw (1564-1617), a 16th-century anatomist, to perform an autopsy. His published notes from the autopsy were rediscovered in the 19th century, first by the German ophthalmologist and historian Julius Hirschberg and then by Edwin B. Dunphy, from Boston, Mass, who suggested that the child suffered from retinoblastoma, an interpretation that has held sway. Critical translation of the original Latin text suggests that an orbital tumor, such as embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, would equally well explain Pauw's observations. His description also gives insight into the concept of a mole as a congenital as well as an intrauterine tumor in Renaissance medicine.
幼儿患癌症的情况并不常见,一直引发人们的好奇心。一名3岁男孩出现眼球突出以及一个巨大、迅速生长的单侧肿瘤,促使16世纪的解剖学家彼得·保乌(1564 - 1617)进行了尸检。他发表的尸检笔记在19世纪被重新发现,先是被德国眼科医生兼历史学家尤利乌斯·希尔施贝格发现,随后被来自马萨诸塞州波士顿的埃德温·B·邓菲发现,后者认为该患儿患有视网膜母细胞瘤,这一解释一直占据主导地位。对原始拉丁文本的严谨翻译表明,眼眶肿瘤,如胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤,同样能很好地解释保乌的观察结果。他的描述还让我们深入了解了文艺复兴时期医学中痣作为先天性以及子宫内肿瘤的概念。