Suppr超能文献

头孢唑林不会加速重症患者的胃排空。

Cefazolin does not accelerate gastric emptying in the critically ill.

作者信息

Chapman M, Fraser R, de Beaux I, Creed S, Finnis M, Butler R, Cmielewski P, Zacharkis B, Davidson G

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, SA 5000, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jul;29(7):1169-72. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1803-2. Epub 2003 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of intravenous cefazolin on gastric emptying measured by the C-13 octanoic acid breath test.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, cross-over, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Mixed multidisciplinary intensive care unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fourteen critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.

INTERVENTIONS

After a 4-h fast patients received either 50 mg cefazolin or 20 ml saline over 20 min immediately prior to measurement of gastric emptying. The next day the study was repeated with the alternative therapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Breath samples were analysed for the concentration of (13)CO2 by mass spectrometer, and the gastric emptying coefficient (GEC) and half-emptying time (t(50)) were calculated. Results are mean (standard deviation). Data were analysed with the paired t-test (saline vs cefazolin). Two patients were excluded for technical problems. Twelve patients remained (six male/six female), aged 57 (+/-16) years, with an APACHE II score of 20 (+/-8). Both GEC and t(50) were unchanged after administration of cefazolin compared with placebo (t(50) cefazolin, 138 (+/-54) vs saline 122 (+/-46) min, P=0.32; GEC cefazolin 3.27 (+/-0.83) vs saline 3.55 (+/-0.6), P=0.24). Two patients had abnormal t(50) after saline and five after cefazolin. There was no order effect of the study day.

CONCLUSION

In mechanically ventilated patients, cefazolin had no effect on gastric emptying. These data do not support the use of low-dose cefazolin as a pro-kinetic agent in critically ill patients.

摘要

目的

通过C-13辛酸呼气试验评估静脉注射头孢唑林对胃排空的影响。

设计

前瞻性、双盲、交叉、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

地点

大学医院的多学科混合重症监护病房。

患者

14名重症机械通气患者。

干预措施

禁食4小时后,在测量胃排空前20分钟内,患者接受50mg头孢唑林或20ml生理盐水静脉注射,持续20分钟。次日,采用替代疗法重复该研究。

测量与结果

用质谱仪分析呼气样本中(13)CO2的浓度,并计算胃排空系数(GEC)和半排空时间(t(50))。结果为均值(标准差)。采用配对t检验(生理盐水组与头孢唑林组)分析数据。两名患者因技术问题被排除。剩余12名患者(6名男性/6名女性),年龄57(±16)岁,急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分为20(±8)。与安慰剂相比,注射头孢唑林后GEC和t(50)均无变化(头孢唑林组t(50)为138(±54)分钟,生理盐水组为122(±46)分钟,P = 0.32;头孢唑林组GEC为3.27(±0.83),生理盐水组为3.55(±0.6),P = 0.24)。两名患者在注射生理盐水后t(50)异常,五名患者在注射头孢唑林后t(50)异常。研究日不存在顺序效应。

结论

在机械通气患者中,头孢唑林对胃排空无影响。这些数据不支持在重症患者中使用低剂量头孢唑林作为促动力药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验