Ozsarlak O, Tjalma W, Schepens E, Corthouts B, Op de Beeck B, Van Marck E, Parizel P M, De Schepper A M
Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
Eur Radiol. 2003 Oct;13(10):2338-45. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1928-2. Epub 2003 Jun 12.
The aim of this study was to compare the preoperative findings of abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI with the preoperative clinical International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) staging and postoperative pathology report in patients with primary cancer of the cervix. Thirty-six patients with surgical-pathological proven primary cancer of the cervix were retrospectively studied for preoperative staging by clinical examination, CT, and MR imaging. Studied parameters for preoperative staging were the presence of tumor, tumor extension into the parametrial tissue, pelvic wall, adjacent organs, and lymph nodes. The CT was performed in 32 patients and MRI (T1- and T2-weighted images) in 29 patients. The CT and MR staging were based on the FIGO staging system. Results were compared with histological findings. The group is consisted of stage 0 (in situ):1, Ia:1, Ib:8, IIa:2, IIb:12, IIIa:4, IVa:6, and IVb:2 patients. The overall accuracy of staging for clinical examination, CT, and MRI was 47, 53, and 86%, respectively. The MRI incorrectly staged 2 patients and did not visualize only two tumors; one was an in situ (stage-0) and one stage-Ia (microscopic) disease. The MRI is more accurate than CT and they are both superior to clinical examination in evaluating the locoregional extension and preoperative staging of primary cancer of the cervix.
本研究的目的是比较原发性宫颈癌患者腹部/盆腔CT和MRI的术前检查结果与术前国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)临床分期及术后病理报告。对36例经手术病理证实为原发性宫颈癌的患者进行回顾性研究,通过临床检查、CT和磁共振成像进行术前分期。术前分期的研究参数包括肿瘤的存在、肿瘤向宫旁组织、盆壁、邻近器官和淋巴结的浸润情况。32例患者进行了CT检查,29例患者进行了MRI(T1加权和T2加权图像)检查。CT和MR分期基于FIGO分期系统。将结果与组织学检查结果进行比较。该组包括0期(原位癌):1例,Ia期:1例,Ib期:8例,IIa期:2例,IIb期:12例,IIIa期:4例,IVa期:6例,IVb期:2例。临床检查、CT和MRI分期的总体准确率分别为47%、53%和86%。MRI对2例患者分期错误,仅未显示两个肿瘤;一个是原位癌(0期),一个是Ia期(微小)疾病。在评估原发性宫颈癌的局部区域浸润和术前分期方面,MRI比CT更准确,且两者均优于临床检查。