Suppr超能文献

双极电汽化术与经尿道前列腺切除术的比较:一项为期1年随访的随机前瞻性单盲试验。

Gyrus bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective single-blind trial with 1 y follow-up.

作者信息

Dunsmuir W D, McFarlane J P, Tan A, Dowling C, Downie J, Kourambas J, Donnellan S, Redgrave N, Fletcher R, Frydenberg M, Love C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2003;6(2):182-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500631.

Abstract

The Gyrus system uses bipolar electrocautery with saline irrigation to vaporize prostatic tissue and is compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a randomized prospective study with 1 y follow-up. Outcomes measured were fluid absorption, blood loss, period of catheterization, hospital stay, symptom scores, quality of life, flow rates, and post-void residual volumes at 3, 6, and 12 months. All measured parameters were similar, although re-catheterization rates were higher (30% vs 5%) in the Gyrus group. Clot evacuation rates were higher in the TURP group (19% vs 0%). The Gyrus device is safe and produces results that are similar to TURP at 1 y.

摘要

在一项为期1年随访的随机前瞻性研究中,Gyrus系统使用盐水冲洗的双极电灼法汽化前列腺组织,并与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)进行比较。测量的结果包括液体吸收、失血量、导尿时间、住院时间、症状评分、生活质量、流速以及3个月、6个月和12个月时的排尿后残余尿量。所有测量参数相似,尽管Gyrus组的再次导尿率更高(30%对5%)。TURP组的血块清除率更高(19%对0%)。Gyrus设备是安全的,并且在1年时产生的结果与TURP相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验