Dunsmuir W D, McFarlane J P, Tan A, Dowling C, Downie J, Kourambas J, Donnellan S, Redgrave N, Fletcher R, Frydenberg M, Love C
Department of Urology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2003;6(2):182-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500631.
The Gyrus system uses bipolar electrocautery with saline irrigation to vaporize prostatic tissue and is compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a randomized prospective study with 1 y follow-up. Outcomes measured were fluid absorption, blood loss, period of catheterization, hospital stay, symptom scores, quality of life, flow rates, and post-void residual volumes at 3, 6, and 12 months. All measured parameters were similar, although re-catheterization rates were higher (30% vs 5%) in the Gyrus group. Clot evacuation rates were higher in the TURP group (19% vs 0%). The Gyrus device is safe and produces results that are similar to TURP at 1 y.
在一项为期1年随访的随机前瞻性研究中,Gyrus系统使用盐水冲洗的双极电灼法汽化前列腺组织,并与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)进行比较。测量的结果包括液体吸收、失血量、导尿时间、住院时间、症状评分、生活质量、流速以及3个月、6个月和12个月时的排尿后残余尿量。所有测量参数相似,尽管Gyrus组的再次导尿率更高(30%对5%)。TURP组的血块清除率更高(19%对0%)。Gyrus设备是安全的,并且在1年时产生的结果与TURP相似。