Van den Brande Jan M H, Braat Henri, van den Brink Gijs R, Versteeg Henri H, Bauer Christiaan A, Hoedemaeker Inge, van Montfrans Catherine, Hommes Daan W, Peppelenbosch Maikel P, van Deventer Sander J H
Laboratory for Experimental Internal Medicine, G2-133, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gastroenterology. 2003 Jun;124(7):1774-85. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00382-2.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Steroid-refractory Crohn's disease responds to therapy with the chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antibody infliximab. Etanercept, a recombinant TNF receptor/immunoglobulin G fusion protein, is highly effective in rheumatoid arthritis but not in Crohn's disease. Because both infliximab and etanercept are TNF-alpha-neutralizing drugs, we investigated the differences in TNF-alpha-neutralizing capacity and human lymphocyte binding and apoptosis-inducing capacity of both molecules.
We used a nuclear factor kappaB reporter assay and a cytotoxicity bioassay to study TNF-alpha neutralization by infliximab and etanercept. Lymphocyte binding and apoptosis-inducing capacity was investigated using fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis, annexin V staining, and cleaved caspase-3 immunoblotting using mixed lymphocyte reaction-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from healthy volunteers and lamina propria T cells from patients with Crohn's disease.
Both infliximab and etanercept neutralized TNF-alpha effectively. Infliximab bound to activated PBL and lamina propria T cells, whereas binding of etanercept was equal to a nonspecific control antibody. Infliximab but not etanercept induced peripheral and lamina propria lymphocyte apoptosis when compared with a control antibody. Infliximab activated caspase 3 in a time-dependent manner, whereas etanercept did not.
Although both infliximab and etanercept showed powerful TNF-alpha neutralization, only infliximab was able to bind to PBL and lamina propria T cells and subsequently to induce apoptosis of activated lymphocytes. These data may provide a biological basis for the difference in efficacy of the 2 TNF-alpha-neutralizing drugs.
类固醇难治性克罗恩病对嵌合型抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α抗体英夫利昔单抗治疗有反应。依那西普是一种重组TNF受体/免疫球蛋白G融合蛋白,在类风湿性关节炎中非常有效,但在克罗恩病中无效。由于英夫利昔单抗和依那西普都是TNF-α中和药物,我们研究了这两种分子在TNF-α中和能力、与人类淋巴细胞结合及诱导凋亡能力方面的差异。
我们使用核因子κB报告基因检测法和细胞毒性生物检测法研究英夫利昔单抗和依那西普对TNF-α的中和作用。使用荧光激活细胞分选分析、膜联蛋白V染色以及对来自健康志愿者的混合淋巴细胞反应刺激的外周血淋巴细胞(PBL)和克罗恩病患者固有层T细胞进行的裂解型半胱天冬酶-3免疫印迹法,研究淋巴细胞结合和诱导凋亡的能力。
英夫利昔单抗和依那西普均能有效中和TNF-α。英夫利昔单抗与活化的PBL和固有层T细胞结合,而依那西普的结合与非特异性对照抗体相当。与对照抗体相比,英夫利昔单抗可诱导外周和固有层淋巴细胞凋亡,而依那西普则不能。英夫利昔单抗以时间依赖性方式激活半胱天冬酶3,而依那西普则不能。
虽然英夫利昔单抗和依那西普都显示出强大的TNF-α中和能力,但只有英夫利昔单抗能够与PBL和固有层T细胞结合,并随后诱导活化淋巴细胞凋亡。这些数据可能为这两种TNF-α中和药物疗效差异提供生物学基础。