Jo Won Min, Choi Young Ho, Sohn Young-Sang, Kim Hark Jei, Hwang Jae Joon, Cho Sung Joon
Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2003 Jun;18(3):360-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2003.18.3.360.
The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in pectus excavatum patients undergoing a Ravitch operation with those undergoing a Nuss procedure. Retrospective study was conducted on one hundred and twenty three patients who underwent Ravitch operation (n=16) and Nuss procedure (n=107) between 1995 and 2002. Mean age of the patients was 7.9+/-6.2 yr. In the Ravitch group, operation time was 196.9+/-61.0 min, and required 10.2+/-2.6 chondral bone resections. Average hospital stay time was 15.9 days. In the Nuss group, operation time was 67.2+/-33.1 min, and bar removal was required two years after the bar insertion. The length of hospital stay was averagely 8.0 days, and postoperative reoperations were performed in five patients due to bar displacements, while early bar removal was required in one patient. The patient interviews for operation results were conducted and revealed that 92.3% of the patients in the Ravitch group showed good to excellent, while 93.3% of Nuss bar removed patients replied good to excellent. Though Nuss procedure has many advantages, it also has some disadvantages. So, the method of the operation should be selected according to the characteristics of the patient.
本研究的目的是比较接受Ravitch手术的漏斗胸患者与接受Nuss手术的患者的临床结果。对1995年至2002年间接受Ravitch手术(n = 16)和Nuss手术(n = 107)的123例患者进行了回顾性研究。患者的平均年龄为7.9±6.2岁。在Ravitch组中,手术时间为196.9±61.0分钟,需要进行10.2±2.6次软骨骨切除。平均住院时间为15.9天。在Nuss组中,手术时间为67.2±33.1分钟,在置入钢板两年后需要取出钢板。住院时间平均为8.0天,5例患者因钢板移位进行了术后再次手术,1例患者需要提前取出钢板。对患者进行了手术结果访谈,结果显示Ravitch组中92.3%的患者显示良好至优秀,而取出Nuss钢板的患者中93.3%回答良好至优秀。虽然Nuss手术有许多优点,但也有一些缺点。因此,应根据患者的特点选择手术方法。