Neilson Julia W, Artiola Janick F, Maier Raina M
Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science, Shantz Building, Room 429, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2003 May-Jun;32(3):899-908. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.8990.
Few effective strategies exist for remediating and restoring metal-contaminated soils. We have evaluated the potential of two environmentally compatible, nondestructive, biological soil-washing agents for remediating aged, lead-contaminated soils. Two contaminated soils were washed with 10 mM rhamnolipid biosurfactant and 5.3% carboxymethyl-beta-cyclodextrin (CMCD). The metal removal efficiency of these agents was compared with 10 mM diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and 10 mM KNO3. Lead removal rates by both soil-washing agents exceeded the removal by KNO3, but were an order of magnitude less than removal by the synthetic chelator, DTPA. Analysis of soil extractions revealed that the Pb in the first soil (3780 mg kg(-1)) was primarily associated with the soluble, exchangeable, oxide, and residual fractions while the Pb in the second soil (23 900 mg kg(-1)) was found in the soluble, exchangeable, carbonate, and residual fractions. After 10 consecutive washes, rhamnolipid had removed 14.2 and 15.3% of the Pb from the first and second soils, respectively, and CMCD had removed 5 and 13.4% from the same two soils. The Pb removal rate by both agents either increased or was consistent throughout the 10 extractions, indicating a potential for continued removal with extended washing. Significant levels of Cu and Zn in both soils did not prevent Pb removal by either agent. Interestingly, the effectiveness of each agent varied as a function of Pb speciation in the soil. Rhamnolipid was more effective than CMCD in removing Pb bound to amorphous iron oxides, while both agents demonstrated similar potential for removing soluble, exchangeable, and carbonate-bound Pb. Neither agent demonstrated potential for the complete remediation of metal-contaminated soils.
对于修复和恢复受金属污染的土壤,几乎没有有效的策略。我们评估了两种环境兼容、无损的生物土壤清洗剂修复老化的、受铅污染土壤的潜力。用10 mM鼠李糖脂生物表面活性剂和5.3%羧甲基-β-环糊精(CMCD)清洗两种受污染土壤。将这些清洗剂的金属去除效率与10 mM二乙烯三胺五乙酸(DTPA)和10 mM硝酸钾进行比较。两种土壤清洗剂的铅去除率均超过硝酸钾,但比合成螯合剂DTPA的去除率低一个数量级。土壤提取物分析表明,第一种土壤(3780 mg kg⁻¹)中的铅主要与可溶、可交换、氧化物和残留部分相关,而第二种土壤(23900 mg kg⁻¹)中的铅存在于可溶、可交换、碳酸盐和残留部分。连续清洗10次后,鼠李糖脂分别从第一种和第二种土壤中去除了14.2%和15.3%的铅,CMCD从相同的两种土壤中去除了5%和13.4%的铅。两种清洗剂的铅去除率在整个10次提取过程中要么增加要么保持一致,表明延长清洗时间有持续去除的潜力。两种土壤中大量的铜和锌并不妨碍任何一种清洗剂去除铅。有趣的是,每种清洗剂的有效性随土壤中铅的形态而变化。鼠李糖脂在去除与无定形铁氧化物结合的铅方面比CMCD更有效,而两种清洗剂在去除可溶、可交换和碳酸盐结合的铅方面显示出相似的潜力。两种清洗剂都没有显示出完全修复金属污染土壤的潜力。