Fadavi S, Punwani I C, Vidyasagar D
Department of Pediatric Dentistry (Drs. Fadavi and Punwani), College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago; and the Department of Neonatology (Dr. Vidyasagar), University of Illinois Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;1(1):48-50. doi: 10.1097/00130478-200007000-00009.
Previous studies demonstrated that the use of a custom-made intraoral acrylic appliance, known as a palatal stabilizing device, prevents palatal groove formation and reduces the frequency rate of accidental extubations in premature, intubated babies. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of a prefabricated palatal device with an acrylic custom-made palatal stabilizing device. Specifically, we compared the stability, fit, and retention of these two devices. DESIGN: Randomized comparative study. SETTING: Clincal trial. PATIENTS: A total of 70 medically stable, premature, intubated babies. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 70 medically stable, premature, intubated babies randomly received Pala-nate (experimental group, n = 34) or palatal stabilizing device (control group, n = 36). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Differences among birth weight, gestational age, and period of intubation of the two groups were statistically nonsignificant at p </=.05. Although both appliances were effective in the prevention of palatal grooves, the Pala-nate was less retentive, thus requiring greater monitoring, and it was associated with a larger number of accidental extubations. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant at p </=.05. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the custom-made, acrylic, palatal stabilizing device was more stable and more effective in the prevention of spontaneous extubations in premature orally intubated infants.
先前的研究表明,使用一种定制的口腔内丙烯酸装置,即腭稳定装置,可防止腭沟形成,并降低早产插管婴儿意外拔管的发生率。在本研究中,我们比较了预制腭装置与丙烯酸定制腭稳定装置的有效性。具体而言,我们比较了这两种装置的稳定性、贴合度和固位性。
随机对照研究。
临床试验。
总共70名病情稳定的早产插管婴儿。
总共70名病情稳定的早产插管婴儿随机接受Pala - nate(实验组,n = 34)或腭稳定装置(对照组,n = 36)。
两组婴儿的出生体重、胎龄和插管时间差异在p≤0.05时无统计学意义。尽管两种装置在预防腭沟方面均有效,但Pala - nate的固位性较差,因此需要更密切的监测,且其与更多的意外拔管事件相关。两组之间的差异在p≤0.05时具有统计学意义。
我们得出结论,定制的丙烯酸腭稳定装置在预防早产经口插管婴儿的自发性拔管方面更稳定且更有效。