• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种子缓存交换促进共存和耦合消费者振荡:以沙漠啮齿动物作为资源处理器的模型。

Seed-cache exchange promotes coexistence and coupled consumer oscillations: a model of desert rodents as resource processors.

作者信息

Price Mary V, Mittler John E

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2003 Jul 21;223(2):215-31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00088-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00088-2
PMID:12814604
Abstract

Most models of resource competition assume that coexistence of consumers depends on tradeoffs in their abilities to exploit shared resources along dimensions of environmental heterogeneity generated by factors external to the consumers. However, consumers may create heterogeneity themselves by modifying resources that they do not immediately consume; such "resource processing" is predicted to allow coexistence if consumers vary in use of resources in primary vs. modified form. To explore whether external food storage (caching) represents a form of resource processing that contributes to observed patterns of species coexistence, we developed a biologically explicit simulation model of competition for a well-studied system, seed-eating desert heteromyid rodents. Here we present the model, compare competitive outcomes with and without inter-specific exchange of cached food, and describe population dynamics of coexisting competitors. The model predicts stable coexistence only when there is exchange of cached seeds via scavenging of caches left undefended by mortality or by pilferage of defended caches. Net interactions between coexisting consumers ranged from competition (10% of cases) to host-parasite (77%), commensalism (12%), and mutualism (1%). Population dynamics of coexisting consumers often showed strong periodicity and coupled synchronous or slightly lagged cycles, a possibility not previously anticipated for desert rodents occupying constant environments. Our model confirms that caching does represent a form of resource processing likely to play a significant role in the dynamics and diversity of communities of desert rodents and other caching animals.

摘要

大多数资源竞争模型假定,消费者的共存取决于它们在利用由消费者外部因素产生的环境异质性维度上的共享资源的能力方面的权衡。然而,消费者可能通过改变它们不会立即消耗的资源来创造异质性;如果消费者在初级形式与改变形式的资源使用上存在差异,那么这种“资源处理”预计会促进共存。为了探究外部食物储存(贮藏)是否代表一种有助于观察到的物种共存模式的资源处理形式,我们针对一个研究充分的系统——以种子为食的沙漠异鼠科啮齿动物,开发了一个具有生物学意义的竞争模拟模型。在此,我们展示该模型,比较有无种间交换贮藏食物时的竞争结果,并描述共存竞争者的种群动态。该模型预测,只有当通过搜寻因死亡而未设防的贮藏点或窃取设防贮藏点来进行贮藏种子的交换时,才会出现稳定共存。共存消费者之间的净相互作用范围从竞争(10%的情况)到宿主 - 寄生虫(77%)、共生(12%)和互利共生(1%)。共存消费者的种群动态通常表现出强烈的周期性以及耦合的同步或略有滞后的周期,这是之前未曾预料到的处于恒定环境中的沙漠啮齿动物会出现的情况。我们的模型证实,贮藏确实代表一种资源处理形式,可能在沙漠啮齿动物及其他贮藏动物群落的动态和多样性中发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Seed-cache exchange promotes coexistence and coupled consumer oscillations: a model of desert rodents as resource processors.种子缓存交换促进共存和耦合消费者振荡:以沙漠啮齿动物作为资源处理器的模型。
J Theor Biol. 2003 Jul 21;223(2):215-31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00088-2.
2
Cachers, scavengers, and thieves: a novel mechanism for desert rodent coexistence.贮藏者、食腐动物和窃贼:沙漠啮齿动物共存的一种新机制。
Am Nat. 2006 Aug;168(2):194-206. doi: 10.1086/506277. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
3
Caching in or Falling Back at the Sevilleta: The Effects of Body Size and Seasonal Uncertainty on Desert Rodent Foraging.塞维利亚塔的缓存或回退:体型大小和季节不确定性对沙漠啮齿动物觅食的影响。
Am Nat. 2020 Aug;196(2):241-256. doi: 10.1086/709019. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Nonequilibrium coexistence in a competition model with nutrient storage.具有养分储存的竞争模型中的非平衡共存
Ecology. 2008 Mar;89(3):865-77. doi: 10.1890/07-1103.1.
5
Food caching and differential cache pilferage: a field study of coexistence of sympatric kangaroo rats and pocket mice.食物贮藏与不同程度的贮藏物被盗:同域分布的更格卢鼠和囊鼠共存的野外研究
Oecologia. 2001 Aug;128(4):577-584. doi: 10.1007/s004420100686. Epub 2001 Aug 1.
6
Tracking Seed Fates of Tropical Tree Species: Evidence for Seed Caching in a Tropical Forest in North-East India.追踪热带树种的种子命运:印度东北部一片热带森林中种子贮藏的证据
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 6;10(8):e0134658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134658. eCollection 2015.
7
Asymmetric competition for seeds between two sympatric food hoarding rodents: implications for coexistence.两种同域食物贮藏型啮齿动物之间对种子的非对称竞争:对共存的启示。
Integr Zool. 2023 Sep;18(5):817-830. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12650. Epub 2022 May 7.
8
Consumer effects on the vital rates of their resource can determine the outcome of competition between consumers.消费者对其资源的重要比率的影响可能决定消费者之间竞争的结果。
Am Nat. 2011 Oct;178(4):452-63. doi: 10.1086/661986. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
9
Seed value influences cache pilfering rates by desert rodents.种子值会影响沙漠啮齿动物的缓存窃取率。
Integr Zool. 2019 Jan;14(1):75-86. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12358.
10
Isotopic niche variation from the Holocene to today reveals minimal partitioning and individualistic dynamics among four sympatric desert mice.从全新世到今天的同位素生态位变化揭示了四种同域沙漠鼠之间最小的分区和个体动态。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):173-186. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12771. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Context-dependent responses of food-hoarding to competitors in Apodemus peninsulae: implications for coexistence among asymmetrical species.半岛姬鼠食物贮藏对竞争者的情境依赖性反应:对不对称物种共存的启示
Integr Zool. 2020 Mar;15(2):115-126. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12425.
2
The history of scatter hoarding studies.散居囤积研究的历史。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 27;365(1542):869-81. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0217.