Suppr超能文献

一种在文拉法辛缓释剂与地西泮治疗广泛性焦虑症患者的短期比较中控制高安慰剂反应率的方法。

A method for controlling for a high placebo response rate in a comparison of venlafaxine XR and diazepam in the short-term treatment of patients with generalised anxiety disorder.

作者信息

Hackett David, Haudiquet Vincent, Salinas Eliseo

机构信息

Wyeth Research, 80 avenue du Général-de-Gaulle, Paris La Défense, France.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;18(4):182-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(03)00046-4.

Abstract

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy of venlafaxine XR (75 or 150 mg/d) with diazepam (15 mg/d) over an 8-week treatment period in 540 non-depressed outpatients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). At week 8, significant improvements from baseline were observed in the venlafaxine XR, diazepam and placebo groups. Although these improvements were higher in the first two groups than in the placebo group for each of the primary efficacy variables (Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total, HAM-A psychic anxiety factor, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) anxiety sub-scale and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement), there were no statistically significant differences between groups. These non-positive results were thought to be due to the very high placebo response observed in some centres. To understand the variability of the study, a secondary preplanned analysis was performed. This involved sub-dividing the study centres according to their ability to detect a two-point mean difference between diazepam and placebo at week 8 on the HAM-A total score. Centres able to show such a difference were termed verum-sensitive. Improvements from baseline to week 8 in venlafaxine XR-treated patients from verum-sensitive centres were significantly greater than in placebo on each of the primary efficacy measures (P </= 0.05). This suggests that those centres able to detect an anxiolytic effect of diazepam were also able to detect an anxiolytic effect of venlafaxine XR. Significant differences in baseline demographics, rates of adverse event reporting and rates of patient discontinuations were noted between patients enrolled at verum-sensitive and verum-insensitive sites. These results reflect the importance of study centre selection in accurately determining efficacy in placebo-controlled trials.

摘要

这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究比较了文拉法辛缓释片(75或150毫克/天)与地西泮(15毫克/天)在8周治疗期内对540例非抑郁广泛性焦虑症(GAD)门诊患者的疗效。在第8周时,文拉法辛缓释片组、地西泮组和安慰剂组与基线相比均有显著改善。尽管在前两组中,每项主要疗效变量(汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM - A)总分、HAM - A精神性焦虑因子、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)焦虑分量表和临床总体印象(CGI)改善情况)的改善程度均高于安慰剂组,但组间无统计学显著差异。这些非阳性结果被认为是由于在某些中心观察到的极高安慰剂反应率所致。为了解该研究的变异性,进行了一项预先计划的二次分析。这涉及根据各研究中心在第8周时检测地西泮与安慰剂在HAM - A总分上两点平均差异的能力对研究中心进行细分。能够显示出这种差异的中心被称为真药敏感中心。在真药敏感中心接受文拉法辛缓释片治疗的患者从基线到第8周的改善情况在每项主要疗效指标上均显著大于安慰剂组(P≤0.05)。这表明那些能够检测到地西泮抗焦虑作用的中心也能够检测到文拉法辛缓释片的抗焦虑作用。在真药敏感和真药不敏感中心招募的患者之间,基线人口统计学、不良事件报告率和患者停药率存在显著差异。这些结果反映了在安慰剂对照试验中准确确定疗效时研究中心选择的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验