Sarabeev Volodimir L, Balbuena Juan Antonio
Department of Biology, Zaporizhzhia State University, 66 Zhykovskogo Street, 69063 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine.
Syst Parasitol. 2003 May;55(1):25-31. doi: 10.1023/a:1023937309228.
Dicrogaster contracta and D. perpusilla were originally described about 100 years ago from the thicklip grey mullet Chelon labrosus. Subsequent studies have reported D. contracta in several mullet species in the Mediterranean, Azov and Caspian Seas, but D. perpusilla has never been reported again. Since previous evidence suggests that the distinguishing features between these two species are uncertain, this study provides new and additional data on the variability of morphometric and meristic characters of D. contracta in order to assess their usefulness for differentiating this species from D. perpusilla. Body measurements, egg counts and shape statistics of three sets of specimens of D. contracta from different hosts and localities were compared with similar information from previous studies, including the original descriptions of D. contracta and D. perpusilla. The results showed consistent differences between the three sets in metric measurements, egg counts and shape statistics. In addition, the values of morphometric and meristic characters of D. perpusilla fell within the range of variation recorded for D. contracta. Neither conventional body measurements, eggs counts, nor shape statistics seemed useful to distinguish D. contracta from D. perpusilla, suggesting that they represent the same species. Accordingly, the valid designation of the species should be D. perpusilla because it is the type-species of the genus. This study proposes a neotype for D. perpusilla, since no type-specimens seem to be available, and provides additional morphologic data that might be useful for diagnosis of the genus Dicrogaster.
收缩双腹吸虫和微小双腹吸虫最初是大约100年前根据厚唇鲻鱼(Chelon labrosus)进行描述的。随后的研究报告在地中海、亚速海和里海的几种鲻鱼物种中发现了收缩双腹吸虫,但微小双腹吸虫再也没有被报道过。由于先前的证据表明这两个物种之间的鉴别特征并不确定,本研究提供了关于收缩双腹吸虫形态测量和可数性状变异性的新的和额外的数据,以便评估它们在区分该物种与微小双腹吸虫方面的有用性。将来自不同宿主和地点的三组收缩双腹吸虫标本的身体测量、卵计数和形状统计数据与先前研究的类似信息进行了比较,包括收缩双腹吸虫和微小双腹吸虫的原始描述。结果表明,这三组在度量测量、卵计数和形状统计方面存在一致的差异。此外,微小双腹吸虫的形态测量和可数性状值落在收缩双腹吸虫记录的变异范围内。传统的身体测量、卵计数和形状统计似乎都无助于区分收缩双腹吸虫和微小双腹吸虫,这表明它们代表同一物种。因此,该物种的有效名称应为微小双腹吸虫,因为它是该属的模式种。由于似乎没有模式标本,本研究为微小双腹吸虫提出了一个新模标本,并提供了可能有助于双腹吸虫属诊断的额外形态学数据。