• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于研究深夜大学生饮酒情况的血液酒精浓度(BAC)数据的现场评估。

Field assessment of BAC data to study late-night college drinking.

作者信息

Thombs Dennis L, Olds R Scott, Snyder Barbara M

机构信息

Health Promotion Program, 316 White Hall, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol. 2003 May;64(3):322-30. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.322.

DOI:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.322
PMID:12817820
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This field study of late-night college drinking sought to (1) test the ability of the 5+/4+ measure to screen for higher levels of intoxication and (2) examine the relation between estimated and actual blood alcohol concentration (BAC).

METHOD

During a 15-week spring semester, college students returning to their residence halls between 10:00 PM and 3:00 AM on Wednesday through Saturday nights were anonymously interviewed to collect BAC and self-report data (n = 1,020).

RESULTS

Although 70.9% had not been drinking on Wednesday nights, a majority of the intercepted students had been drinking on the other three nights. Mean BACs on these three nights were in a moderate range (48 to 51 mg/dl), but the 5+/4+ measure classified many students as heavy episodic drinkers at relatively low BACs. For example, 66.3% of those meeting the 5+/4+ criterion for the night had BACs < 100 mg/dl. Students with BACs ranging from 70 to 90 mg/dl exhibited the greatest accuracy in estimating their BAC; those with lower BACs tended to overestimate their level of intoxication; whereas those with higher BACs tended to underestimate it.

CONCLUSIONS

Field assessment of student intoxication is an important tool for examining research questions in college drinking. The 5+/4+ measure classifies many college students as heavy episodic drinkers, even though their intoxication level is below conventional thresholds used to define drunkenness. In addition, there is a discernible pattern of BAC estimation in the field that corresponds to intoxication level.

摘要

目的

这项关于深夜大学生饮酒的实地研究旨在(1)测试5+/4+测量法筛查更高中毒水平的能力,以及(2)检验估计血液酒精浓度(BAC)与实际BAC之间的关系。

方法

在春季学期的15周内,对周三至周六晚上10点至凌晨3点返回宿舍的大学生进行匿名访谈,以收集BAC和自我报告数据(n = 1020)。

结果

尽管70.9%的学生在周三晚上没有饮酒,但大多数被拦截的学生在其他三个晚上都有饮酒。这三个晚上的平均BAC处于中等范围(48至51毫克/分升),但5+/4+测量法将许多学生在相对较低的BAC水平时就归类为重度偶发性饮酒者。例如,在某晚符合5+/4+标准的学生中,66.3%的人BAC < 100毫克/分升。BAC在70至90毫克/分升之间的学生在估计自己的BAC时表现出最高的准确性;BAC较低的学生往往高估自己的中毒水平;而BAC较高的学生则往往低估它。

结论

对学生中毒情况的实地评估是研究大学生饮酒问题的重要工具。5+/4+测量法将许多大学生归类为重度偶发性饮酒者,即使他们的中毒水平低于用于定义醉酒的传统阈值。此外,实地研究中存在一种与中毒水平相对应的可识别的BAC估计模式。

相似文献

1
Field assessment of BAC data to study late-night college drinking.用于研究深夜大学生饮酒情况的血液酒精浓度(BAC)数据的现场评估。
J Stud Alcohol. 2003 May;64(3):322-30. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.322.
2
How drunk am I? Misperceiving one's level of intoxication in the college drinking environment.我醉了多少?在大学生饮酒环境中对醉酒程度的错误感知。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Mar;26(1):51-8. doi: 10.1037/a0023942. Epub 2011 May 23.
3
Drinking on campus: self-reports and breath tests.校园饮酒:自我报告与呼气测试
J Stud Alcohol. 2004 Sep;65(5):600-4. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.600.
4
Inconsistencies between actual and estimated blood alcohol concentrations in a field study of college students: do students really know how much they drink?一项针对大学生的现场研究中实际血液酒精浓度与估计血液酒精浓度之间的差异:学生真的知道自己喝了多少酒吗?
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Sep;29(9):1672-6. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000179205.24180.4a.
5
Accuracy of Estimated Blood Alcohol Concentration Norms From College Student Drinking Survey Data: Verification Using Matched Late-Night Breath Measurements.基于大学生饮酒调查数据的估算血液酒精浓度(BAC)标准的准确性:使用匹配深夜呼吸测量值进行验证。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 May;79(3):455-464.
6
Factors Associated with Self-Estimated Breath Alcohol Concentration Among Bar Patrons.酒吧顾客自我估计的呼气酒精浓度相关因素
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Aug;41(8):1492-1501. doi: 10.1111/acer.13428. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
7
Drinking levels, alcohol problems and secondhand effects in substance-free college residences: results of a national study.无毒品大学宿舍中的饮酒水平、酒精问题及二手影响:一项全国性研究的结果
J Stud Alcohol. 2001 Jan;62(1):23-31. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.23.
8
Predictors of at-risk intoxication in a university field setting: social anxiety, demographics, and intentions.大学实地环境中危险醉酒的预测因素:社交焦虑、人口统计学特征及意图。
J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(2):134-42. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.990968. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
9
College students' responses to a 5/4 drinking question and maximum blood alcohol concentration calculated from a timeline followback questionnaire.大学生对一个5/4饮酒问题的回答以及根据时间回溯问卷计算出的最大血液酒精浓度。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Jul;70(4):601-5. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.601.
10
Malt liquor use, heavy/problem drinking and other problem behaviors in a sample of community college students.社区大学生样本中的麦芽酒使用、重度/问题饮酒及其他问题行为。
J Stud Alcohol. 2003 Nov;64(6):835-42. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.835.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the relationship between inaccurate blood alcohol concentration estimates, harm and other negative consequences.调查血醇浓度估计不准确与伤害和其他负面后果之间的关系。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Feb;42(2):467-475. doi: 10.1111/dar.13569. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
Accuracy of Consumer-marketed smartphone-paired alcohol breath testing devices: A laboratory validation study.市售智能手机配套酒精呼气测试设备的准确性:一项实验室验证研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 May;45(5):1091-1099. doi: 10.1111/acer.14597. Epub 2021 May 9.
3
Measuring subjective alcohol effects in daily life using contemporary young adult language.
使用当代青年用语测量日常生活中的主观酒精效应。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Apr;30(2):151-158. doi: 10.1037/pha0000447. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
Flexibly modeling alcohol use disorder risk: How many drinks should we count?灵活建模酒精使用障碍风险:我们应该计算多少杯酒?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Feb;33(1):50-57. doi: 10.1037/adb0000431. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
5
Characterizing conditioned reactivity to sequential alcohol-predictive cues in well-trained rats.描述在训练有素的大鼠中对序贯酒精预测线索的条件反应特性。
Alcohol. 2018 Jun;69:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.11.034. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Victim Alcohol Intoxication During a Sexual Assault: Relations With Subsequent PTSD Symptoms.性侵犯期间受害者酒精中毒:与后续创伤后应激障碍症状的关系。
Violence Vict. 2017 Aug 1;32(4):642-657. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00045. Epub 2017 May 17.
7
Do Executive Functions Predict Binge-Drinking Patterns? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study in Young Adulthood.执行功能能否预测暴饮模式?来自一项青年期纵向研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;8:489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00489. eCollection 2017.
8
Postretrieval Extinction Attenuates Alcohol Cue Reactivity in Rats.检索后消退减弱大鼠的酒精线索反应性。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Mar;41(3):608-617. doi: 10.1111/acer.13323. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
9
Drinking to toxicity: college students referred for emergency medical evaluation.饮酒致中毒:因急诊医学评估而前来就诊的大学生。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2016 Jun 8;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13722-016-0059-4.
10
Modulation of BK Channels by Ethanol.乙醇对大电导钙激活钾通道的调节作用
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2016;128:239-79. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 May 12.