Thombs Dennis L, Olds R Scott, Snyder Barbara M
Health Promotion Program, 316 White Hall, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 2003 May;64(3):322-30. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.322.
This field study of late-night college drinking sought to (1) test the ability of the 5+/4+ measure to screen for higher levels of intoxication and (2) examine the relation between estimated and actual blood alcohol concentration (BAC).
During a 15-week spring semester, college students returning to their residence halls between 10:00 PM and 3:00 AM on Wednesday through Saturday nights were anonymously interviewed to collect BAC and self-report data (n = 1,020).
Although 70.9% had not been drinking on Wednesday nights, a majority of the intercepted students had been drinking on the other three nights. Mean BACs on these three nights were in a moderate range (48 to 51 mg/dl), but the 5+/4+ measure classified many students as heavy episodic drinkers at relatively low BACs. For example, 66.3% of those meeting the 5+/4+ criterion for the night had BACs < 100 mg/dl. Students with BACs ranging from 70 to 90 mg/dl exhibited the greatest accuracy in estimating their BAC; those with lower BACs tended to overestimate their level of intoxication; whereas those with higher BACs tended to underestimate it.
Field assessment of student intoxication is an important tool for examining research questions in college drinking. The 5+/4+ measure classifies many college students as heavy episodic drinkers, even though their intoxication level is below conventional thresholds used to define drunkenness. In addition, there is a discernible pattern of BAC estimation in the field that corresponds to intoxication level.
这项关于深夜大学生饮酒的实地研究旨在(1)测试5+/4+测量法筛查更高中毒水平的能力,以及(2)检验估计血液酒精浓度(BAC)与实际BAC之间的关系。
在春季学期的15周内,对周三至周六晚上10点至凌晨3点返回宿舍的大学生进行匿名访谈,以收集BAC和自我报告数据(n = 1020)。
尽管70.9%的学生在周三晚上没有饮酒,但大多数被拦截的学生在其他三个晚上都有饮酒。这三个晚上的平均BAC处于中等范围(48至51毫克/分升),但5+/4+测量法将许多学生在相对较低的BAC水平时就归类为重度偶发性饮酒者。例如,在某晚符合5+/4+标准的学生中,66.3%的人BAC < 100毫克/分升。BAC在70至90毫克/分升之间的学生在估计自己的BAC时表现出最高的准确性;BAC较低的学生往往高估自己的中毒水平;而BAC较高的学生则往往低估它。
对学生中毒情况的实地评估是研究大学生饮酒问题的重要工具。5+/4+测量法将许多大学生归类为重度偶发性饮酒者,即使他们的中毒水平低于用于定义醉酒的传统阈值。此外,实地研究中存在一种与中毒水平相对应的可识别的BAC估计模式。