Division of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.
Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Area, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.
Alcohol. 2018 Jun;69:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.11.034. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Implicit learning about antecedent stimuli and the unconditional stimulus (US) properties of alcohol may facilitate the progressive loss of control over drinking. To model this learning, Cofresí et al. (2017) developed a procedure in which a discrete, visual conditional stimulus (houselight illumination; CS) predicted the availability of a retractable sipper that rats could lick to receive unsweetened alcohol [Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 41, 608-617]. Here we investigated the possibility that houselight illumination, sipper presentation, and oral alcohol receipt might each exert control over alcohol seeking and drinking. We also determined the relationship between ingested dose and blood alcohol concentration, in order to validate the idea that the US is a post-ingestive action of alcohol. Finally, we tested a major prediction from the conditioning account of problematic drinking [Tomie, A., & Sharma, N. (2013). Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 6, 201-219], which is that once learned, responses elicited by a CS will promote drinking. We found that despite having constrained opportunities to drink alcohol during the conditioning procedure, ingested doses produced discriminable blood concentrations that supported cue conditioning. Based on our analysis of the dynamics of cue reactivity in well-trained rats, we found that houselight illumination triggered conditioned approach, sipper presentation evoked licking behavior, and alcohol receipt promoted drinking. Reactivity to these cues, which varied in terms of their temporal proximity to the alcohol US, persisted despite progressive intoxication or satiety. Additionally, rats with the greatest conditioned reactivity to the most distal alcohol cue were also the fastest to initiate drinking and drank the most. Our findings indicate that the post-ingestive effects of alcohol may condition multiple cues simultaneously in adult rats, and these multiple cues help to trigger alcohol seeking and drinking. Moreover, identification and characterization of these cues should be helpful for designing interventions that attenuate the power of these cues over behavior.
内隐学习关于先前刺激和酒精的无条件刺激(US)属性可能促进对饮酒的逐渐失控。为了模拟这种学习,Cofresí 等人(2017 年)开发了一种程序,其中离散的视觉条件刺激(房屋灯光照明;CS)预测可伸缩吸吮器的可用性,老鼠可以舔舐以接收无糖酒精[《酒精中毒:临床与实验研究》,41,608-617]。在这里,我们研究了房屋灯光照明、吸吮器呈现和口服酒精摄入是否都可能对酒精寻求和饮酒产生控制作用。我们还确定了摄入剂量与血液酒精浓度之间的关系,以验证 US 是酒精的摄入后作用的观点。最后,我们测试了从有问题的饮酒的条件作用理论[Tomie, A., & Sharma, N. (2013). Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 6, 201-219]中得出的一个主要预测,即一旦学习,CS 引起的反应将促进饮酒。我们发现,尽管在条件作用过程中饮酒机会受到限制,但摄入的剂量会产生可区分的血液浓度,支持线索条件作用。根据我们对训练有素的老鼠线索反应动力学的分析,我们发现房屋灯光照明引发条件性接近,吸吮器呈现引起舔舐行为,而酒精摄入促进饮酒。尽管逐渐中毒或饱腹感,这些线索的反应性仍然存在,这些线索的反应性因与酒精 US 的时间接近程度而异。此外,对最遥远的酒精线索有最大条件反应性的老鼠也最快开始饮酒,并且喝得最多。我们的研究结果表明,酒精的摄入后效应可能在成年老鼠中同时调节多个线索,这些多个线索有助于触发酒精寻求和饮酒。此外,识别和表征这些线索应该有助于设计可以减弱这些线索对行为的影响的干预措施。