• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[微创内侧单髁膝关节置换术]

[Minimally invasive medial unicompartmental knee replacement].

作者信息

Labek G, Böhler N

机构信息

Orthopädische Abteilung, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Orthopade. 2003 Jun;32(6):454-60. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0474-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00132-003-0474-6
PMID:12819883
Abstract

Medial unicompartmental knee replacements have been used for more than 40 years. Due to increased experience in determining the indication for use and improvements in design of the prosthesis and tribology, the long-term results have now reached a high level. The advantages of these systems are less bone loss and better proprioception. The disadvantage is the risk of panarthrosis, which might be reduced by accurate indications for operations. Good indications are patients older than 60 years with normal weight and normal sports activity. Well-functioning collateral and cruciate ligaments are mandatory. Due to the fact that during implantation eversion of the patella is not necessary, a minimally invasive approach might be used. Overcorrection of the mechanical axis of the leg should be avoided. By observing these principles, very good long-term results can be achieved with medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Better proprioception and better mobility of the knee are advantages of these implants compared to total knee arthroplasty. In the case of revision with a bicondylar implant, the situation is less complex compared to revisions after osteotomies or bicondylar replacements. Remobilization in this situation is shorter with better results compared to a revision with a bicondylar prosthesis.

摘要

内侧单髁膝关节置换术已应用40多年。由于在确定使用指征方面经验增加以及假体设计和摩擦学方面的改进,目前长期效果已达到较高水平。这些系统的优点是骨丢失少和本体感觉更好。缺点是全关节病的风险,通过准确的手术指征可能会降低这种风险。良好的指征是年龄大于60岁、体重正常且体育活动正常的患者。侧副韧带和交叉韧带功能良好是必需的。由于在植入过程中无需髌骨外翻,因此可以采用微创方法。应避免过度矫正下肢的机械轴。遵循这些原则,内侧单髁关节置换术可取得非常好的长期效果。与全膝关节置换术相比,这些植入物的优点是本体感觉更好且膝关节活动度更好。在使用双髁假体进行翻修的情况下,与截骨术或双髁置换术后的翻修相比,情况不太复杂。与使用双髁假体进行翻修相比,这种情况下的康复时间更短,效果更好。

相似文献

1
[Minimally invasive medial unicompartmental knee replacement].[微创内侧单髁膝关节置换术]
Orthopade. 2003 Jun;32(6):454-60. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0474-6.
2
[Minimally Invasive Stryker-Osteonics unicondylar knee prosthesis with metal-backed tibia component: a 5-year follow-up].[带金属背衬胫骨部件的微创史赛克-奥斯特尼克斯单髁膝关节假体:5年随访]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005 Sep-Oct;143(5):573-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836833.
3
Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study.骨水泥固定的全聚乙烯胫骨衬垫单髁膝关节置换术:一项长期随访研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Feb;95(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.04.001. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
4
Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications.微创单髁膝关节置换术:原理与正确适应症
Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;35(2):191-200. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00115-9.
5
Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases.微创牛津3期单髁膝关节置换术:1000例结果
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Feb;93(2):198-204. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25767.
6
Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!微创牛津内侧单髁膝关节置换术。注意事项!
Int Orthop. 2007 Jun;31(3):321-4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0202-z. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
7
Navigation in minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has no advantage in comparison to a conventional minimally invasive implantation.在微创单髁膝关节置换术中,导航并没有比传统微创植入术更有优势。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Feb;132(2):281-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1404-4. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
8
Analysis of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the minimally invasive technique in patients aged 60 and above: an independent prospective series.60岁及以上患者采用微创技术进行牛津内侧单髁膝关节置换术的分析:一项独立前瞻性系列研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Nov;15(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0397-6. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
9
Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?膝关节关节炎中采用导航下较短切口或较小植入物?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Oct;463:63-7. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31811f3a30.
10
LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.LCS 活动平台型全膝关节置换术。10 年随访研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
[Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].单髁关节置换术中的微创植入
Orthopade. 2007 Dec;36(12):1093-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-007-1168-2.
2
[Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation].[计算机导航下的微创单髁膝关节置换术]
Orthopade. 2006 Oct;35(10):1073-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-1006-y.
3
[The minimally invasive unicompartmental knee system "Preservation"First clinical results and analysis of complications].[微创单髁膝关节系统“Preservation”:初步临床结果及并发症分析]
Orthopade. 2004 Nov;33(11):1284-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-004-0716-2.