Romero J, Stähelin T, Wyss T, Hofmann S
Kniechirurgie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Balgrist, Zürich, Switzerland.
Orthopade. 2003 Jun;32(6):461-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0475-5.
Increased internal malrotation of the tibial and femoral components affects kinematics of the patellofemoral joint and the flexion gap. A combined tibial and femoral malrotation may lead to maltracking of the patella. Isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component results in an asymmetric flexion gap. Clinically, the patients suffer from either lateral instability or medial stiffness in flexion. Lateral flexion instability leads to medial tibial pain,difficulties standing up from a chair,or instability during descending stairs or walking downhill. Medial stiffness in flexion may lead to secondary arthrofibrosis. There are three methods for determining femoral rotation by bony landmarks: (1) posterior condyles with 3 degrees of external rotation, (2) anterior-posterior axis according to Whiteside, and (3) transepicondylar axis. The transepicondylar axis approximates the flexion axis of the knee. All three bony landmarks have the disadvantage that they will not create a symmetric flexion gap in all cases. The balanced flexion gap technique seeks to achieve a perfectly balanced extension gap first, and then aligns the femoral component parallel to the tibial resection plane when the knee is under symmetric distraction in 90 degrees of flexion. The soft tissue releases for varus or valgus contraction have to be performed in extension first until the mechanical axis passes through the center of the knee, the center of the femoral head, and the center of the ankle. Using these methods, both,extension and flexion gap will become rectangular. The balanced flexion gap method has the disadvantage that the femoral component will not be aligned parallel to the epicondylar axis in some cases. It is not known which of the two methods will produce better clinical results. Rotational positioning of the tibial component referenced on the tibial tuberosity represents the most reliable method. Placing the tibial component according to the femoral component using the floating technique may increase an internal malrotation problem of the femur if present.
胫骨和股骨部件内旋增加会影响髌股关节的运动学和屈曲间隙。胫骨和股骨联合内旋可能导致髌骨轨迹不良。股骨部件单独内旋会导致屈曲间隙不对称。临床上,患者会出现外侧不稳定或屈曲时内侧僵硬。外侧屈曲不稳定会导致胫骨内侧疼痛、从椅子上站起来困难或下楼梯或下坡行走时不稳定。屈曲时内侧僵硬可能导致继发性关节纤维性变。通过骨性标志确定股骨旋转有三种方法:(1)后髁外旋3度,(2)根据怀特赛德法确定前后轴,(3)经髁间轴。经髁间轴近似膝关节的屈曲轴。所有这三个骨性标志的缺点是,在所有情况下它们都不会产生对称的屈曲间隙。平衡屈曲间隙技术首先试图实现完美平衡的伸直间隙,然后在膝关节于90度屈曲时对称牵张的情况下,使股骨部件与胫骨截骨平面平行对齐。对于内翻或外翻挛缩的软组织松解必须首先在伸直位进行,直到机械轴穿过膝关节中心、股骨头中心和踝关节中心。使用这些方法,伸直和屈曲间隙都将变成矩形。平衡屈曲间隙方法的缺点是,在某些情况下股骨部件不会与髁上轴平行对齐。尚不清楚这两种方法中哪种会产生更好的临床效果。以胫骨结节为参考确定胫骨部件的旋转定位是最可靠的方法。如果存在股骨内旋问题,使用浮动技术根据股骨部件放置胫骨部件可能会增加股骨内旋问题。