Krupp L B, Hyman L G, Grimson R, Coyle P K, Melville P, Ahnn S, Dattwyler R, Chandler B
Department of Neurology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8121, USA.
Neurology. 2003 Jun 24;60(12):1923-30. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000071227.23769.9e.
To determine whether post Lyme syndrome (PLS) is antibiotic responsive.
The authors conducted a single-center randomized double-masked placebo-controlled trial on 55 patients with Lyme disease with persistent severe fatigue at least 6 or more months after antibiotic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 28 days of IV ceftriaxone or placebo. The primary clinical outcomes were improvement in fatigue, defined by a change of 0.7 points or more on an 11-item fatigue questionnaire, and improvement in cognitive function (mental speed), defined by a change of 25% or more on a test of reaction time. The primary laboratory outcome was an experimental measure of CSF infection, outer surface protein A (OspA). Outcome data were collected at the 6-month visit.
Patients assigned to ceftriaxone showed improvement in disabling fatigue compared to the placebo group (rate ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.50 to 8.03; p = 0.001). No beneficial treatment effect was observed for cognitive function or the laboratory measure of persistent infection. Four patients, three of whom were on placebo, had adverse events associated with treatment, which required hospitalization.
Ceftriaxone therapy in patients with PLS with severe fatigue was associated with an improvement in fatigue but not with cognitive function or an experimental laboratory measure of infection in this study. Because fatigue (a nonspecific symptom) was the only outcome that improved and because treatment was associated with adverse events, this study does not support the use of additional antibiotic therapy with parenteral ceftriaxone in post-treatment, persistently fatigued patients with PLS.
确定莱姆病后综合征(PLS)是否对抗生素有反应。
作者对55例抗生素治疗后至少6个月或更长时间仍持续严重疲劳的莱姆病患者进行了一项单中心随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。患者被随机分配接受28天的静脉注射头孢曲松或安慰剂治疗。主要临床结局指标为疲劳改善情况,通过11项疲劳问卷上0.7分或更高的变化来定义;以及认知功能(思维速度)改善情况,通过反应时间测试中25%或更高的变化来定义。主要实验室结局指标为脑脊液感染的实验指标,即外表面蛋白A(OspA)。在6个月随访时收集结局数据。
与安慰剂组相比,接受头孢曲松治疗的患者在致残性疲劳方面有所改善(率比为3.5;95%置信区间为1.50至8.03;p = 0.001)。未观察到对认知功能或持续性感染的实验室指标有有益的治疗效果。有4例患者出现与治疗相关的不良事件,其中3例使用安慰剂,这些不良事件需要住院治疗。
在本研究中,对患有严重疲劳的PLS患者使用头孢曲松治疗与疲劳改善相关,但与认知功能或感染的实验实验室指标无关。由于疲劳(一种非特异性症状)是唯一改善的结局指标,且治疗与不良事件相关,因此本研究不支持在治疗后持续疲劳的PLS患者中使用额外的静脉注射头孢曲松抗生素治疗。