• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[兽医当局与动物福利组织——合作可行吗?]

[Veterinary authorities and animal welfare organizations--is cooperation possible?].

作者信息

Förster S

机构信息

Kreis Kleve, Fachbereich Gesundheit, Abteilung Veterinärangelegenheiten, Kleve.

出版信息

Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2003 May;110(5):199-205.

PMID:12822254
Abstract

Veterinarians and private animal welfare workers both work for the importance of animal welfare in our society. Although both work for a common cause, co-operation and communication between the veterinary administration and animal welfare members is often difficult. This paper will demonstrate the cause of problems between the two bodies and the benefits of co-operation will be assessed. Strategies to optimise the co-operation between the veterinary administration and animal rights organisations will be described using the local district Kleve as an example. Experiences with the animal welfare societies in this region will be illustrated with the aim to show the important supporting possibilities of the animal rights organisations to back the official authorities activities. Also the need to encourage the partly disappointing co-operation between these two bodies with the exchange of information would be beneficial for both bodies.

摘要

兽医和私人动物福利工作者都致力于推动动物福利在我们社会中的重要性。尽管两者都为共同事业而努力,但兽医管理部门与动物福利成员之间的合作与沟通往往存在困难。本文将阐述这两个机构之间问题产生的原因,并评估合作带来的益处。将以克莱沃当地行政区为例,描述优化兽医管理部门与动物权利组织之间合作的策略。将举例说明该地区动物福利协会的经验,旨在展示动物权利组织为官方机构活动提供重要支持的可能性。此外,通过信息交流来鼓励这两个机构之间部分令人失望的合作,对双方都将有益。

相似文献

1
[Veterinary authorities and animal welfare organizations--is cooperation possible?].[兽医当局与动物福利组织——合作可行吗?]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2003 May;110(5):199-205.
2
Veterinarians as advocates for animal rights.兽医作为动物权利的倡导者。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Aug 1;229(3):350-2. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.3.350.
3
[The National Order of Veterinary Doctors of Madagascar and the quality control of private veterinarians].[马达加斯加国家兽医协会与私人兽医的质量控制]
Rev Sci Tech. 2004 Apr;23(1):199-205; discussion 391-401.
4
Veterinary engagement in the charity sector.兽医在慈善领域的参与。
Vet Rec. 2016 Jan 2;178(1):12-5. doi: 10.1136/vr.h6881.
5
Commentary on animal rights stirs more debate.关于动物权利的评论引发了更多争论。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Oct 1;229(7):1080, author reply 1080-1. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.7.1080.
6
[Handling of the petition for ritual slaughter (the area of conflict of the official veterinarian between the special requirements and legal possibilities). Veterinary specialist view].[关于宗教屠宰申请的处理(官方兽医在特殊要求与法律可能性之间的冲突领域)。兽医专家观点]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2004 Mar;111(3):102-6.
7
Effects of animal rights issues on the veterinary profession.动物权利问题对兽医行业的影响。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Jun 15;226(12):1980, 1982.
8
Commentary on animal rights stirs more debate.关于动物权利的评论引发了更多争论。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Oct 1;229(7):1081.
9
AVMA leaders lobby for more public health veterinarians.美国兽医协会领导人游说增加公共卫生兽医的数量。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 May 15;228(10):1468-9. doi: 10.2460/javma.228.10.1465.
10
The World Veterinary Association and animal welfare.世界兽医协会与动物福利。
Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Aug;24(2):639-46.