• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估健康计划质量3:调查测量属性。

Evaluating health plan quality 3: survey measurement properties.

作者信息

Wholey Douglas R, Finch Michael, Christianson Jon B, Knutson David, Rockwood Todd, Warrick Louise

机构信息

Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn 55455, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9 Spec No 2:SP76-87.

PMID:12822717
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the measurement and scaling properties of survey items designed to measure health plan quality from a physician's perspective.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective survey design with multivariate regression analysis.

METHODS

Data were from 3798 physicians representing 23 health plans in 5 regions: Florida, New York, Colorado, Pennsylvania, and Washington. Scale reliability was assessed by using the Cronbach alpha. Generalist and specialist scales were compared with structural equation modeling. Multivariate analysis was used to examine internal validity by testing theoretically based hypotheses.

RESULTS

Scales constructed from the data were reliable, were stable across both generalist and specialist physicians, and demonstrated construct validity. Hypotheses about the relationship between physician experiences with a health plan and physician recommendations of the plan were confirmed, supporting construct validity.

CONCLUSION

The items on the survey instrument can be used with confidence to measure health plan quality from a physician perspective.

摘要

目的

从医生的角度评估旨在衡量健康计划质量的调查项目的测量和量表特性。

研究设计

采用多变量回归分析的前瞻性调查设计。

方法

数据来自代表佛罗里达州、纽约州、科罗拉多州、宾夕法尼亚州和华盛顿州5个地区23个健康计划的3798名医生。使用克朗巴哈系数评估量表信度。通过结构方程模型比较全科医生和专科医生量表。多变量分析用于通过检验基于理论的假设来检验内部效度。

结果

根据数据构建的量表可靠,在全科医生和专科医生中都很稳定,并显示出结构效度。关于医生对健康计划的体验与医生对该计划的推荐之间关系的假设得到证实,支持结构效度。

结论

调查问卷中的项目可以放心地用于从医生角度衡量健康计划质量。

相似文献

1
Evaluating health plan quality 3: survey measurement properties.评估健康计划质量3:调查测量属性。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9 Spec No 2:SP76-87.
2
Evaluating health plan quality 2: survey design principles for measuring health plan quality.评估健康计划质量2:衡量健康计划质量的调查设计原则
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9 Spec No 2:SP65-75.
3
What do physician recommendations of health plans mean?医生对健康计划的推荐意味着什么?
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9 Spec No 2:SP88-99.
4
Evaluating health plan quality 1: a conceptual model.评估健康计划质量1:概念模型
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9 Spec No 2:SP53-64.
5
Physicians' reports of their experience with health plan care management practices.医生们关于他们在健康计划护理管理实践方面经验的报告。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9 Spec No 2:SP100-10.
6
Using existing population-based data sets to measure the American Academy of Pediatrics definition of medical home for all children and children with special health care needs.利用现有的基于人群的数据集,衡量美国儿科学会对所有儿童及有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的医疗之家定义。
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5 Suppl):1529-37.
7
Improving the quality of the NCQA (National Committee for Quality Assurance) Annual Member Health Care Survey Version 1.0.提高美国国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)年度会员医疗保健调查1.0版的质量。
Am J Manag Care. 1997 May;3(5):719-30.
8
The influence of organizational structure on physician satisfaction: findings from a national survey.组织结构对医生满意度的影响:一项全国性调查的结果
Eff Clin Pract. 2000 Mar-Apr;3(2):62-8.
9
Stakeholder perceptions of quality in managed care plans.利益相关者对管理式医疗计划质量的看法。
Manag Care Q. 2003 Spring;11(2):12-21.
10
Provider attitudes toward pay-for-performance programs: development and validation of a measurement instrument.医疗服务提供者对按绩效付费项目的态度:一种测量工具的开发与验证
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1959-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00582.x.