• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威结直肠癌预防(NORCCAP)筛查研究:50 - 64岁年龄组临床检查的基线结果与实施情况

The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years.

作者信息

Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B, Bretthauer M, Eide T J, Hoff G

机构信息

The Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Montebello, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jun;38(6):635-42. doi: 10.1080/00365520310003002.

DOI:10.1080/00365520310003002
PMID:12825872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials of sufficient power testing the long-term effect of screening for colorectal neoplasia only exist for faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). There is indirect evidence that flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) may have a greater yield. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of screening with FS or a combination of FS and FOBT in an average-risk population in an urban and combined urban and rural population in Norway.

METHODS

20,780 men and women (1:1), aged 50-64 years, were invited for once-only screening (FS only or a combination of FS and FOBT (1:1)) by randomization from the population registry. A positive FS was defined as a finding of any neoplasia or any polyp > or = 10 mm. A positive FS or FOBT qualified for colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Overall attendance was 65%. Forty-one (0.3%) cases of CRC were detected. Any adenoma was found in 2208 (17%) participants and 545 (4.2%) had high-risk adenomas. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between the FS and the FS and FOBT group regarding CRC or high-risk adenoma. Work-up load comprised 2821 colonoscopies in 2524 (20%) screenees and 10% of screenees were recommended later colonoscopy surveillance. There were no severe complications at FS, but six perforations after therapeutic colonoscopy (1:336).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study bodes well for future management of a national screening programme, provided that follow-up results reflect adequate proof of a net benefit. It is highly questionable whether the addition of once-only FOBT to FS will contribute to this effect.

摘要

背景

仅粪便潜血试验(FOBT)有足够样本量的随机对照试验来检验结直肠肿瘤筛查的长期效果。有间接证据表明,乙状结肠镜检查(FS)可能有更高的检出率。本研究的目的是确定在挪威城市以及城市与农村相结合的普通风险人群中,FS筛查或FS与FOBT联合筛查的诊断率。

方法

从人口登记处随机邀请20780名年龄在50 - 64岁的男女(1:1)进行一次性筛查(仅FS或FS与FOBT联合筛查(1:1))。FS阳性定义为发现任何肿瘤或任何直径大于或等于10毫米的息肉。FS或FOBT阳性者需接受结肠镜检查。

结果

总体参与率为65%。共检测出41例(0.3%)结直肠癌病例。2208名(17%)参与者发现有任何腺瘤,545名(4.2%)有高危腺瘤。在结直肠癌或高危腺瘤的诊断率方面,FS组与FS和FOBT联合组之间没有差异。检查工作量包括对2524名(20%)受检者进行2821次结肠镜检查,10%的受检者被建议后续进行结肠镜监测。FS检查时无严重并发症,但治疗性结肠镜检查后有6例穿孔(1:336)。

结论

本研究对未来国家筛查计划的管理预示着良好前景,前提是随访结果能充分证明有净效益。在FS基础上增加一次性FOBT是否会产生这种效果,这是非常值得怀疑的。

相似文献

1
The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years.挪威结直肠癌预防(NORCCAP)筛查研究:50 - 64岁年龄组临床检查的基线结果与实施情况
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jun;38(6):635-42. doi: 10.1080/00365520310003002.
2
Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia: attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention).一项用于检测结直肠肿瘤的对照人群筛查研究的设计、组织与管理:NORCCAP研究(挪威结直肠癌预防研究)的参与率
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 May;37(5):568-73. doi: 10.1080/00365520252903125.
3
Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.结直肠癌筛查:基于愈创木脂和免疫化学粪便潜血检测与柔性乙状结肠镜检查的随机试验比较。
Gut. 2010 Jan;59(1):62-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.177089.
4
Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.CT结肠成像、结肠镜检查、乙状结肠镜检查和粪便潜血试验用于检测平均风险人群中进展性腺瘤的比较。
Gut. 2009 Feb;58(2):241-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.156448. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
5
Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT).挪威结直肠癌预防试验中关于乙状结肠镜筛查的粪便钙卫蛋白(PhiCal)检测:与潜血免疫化学检测(FlexSure OBT)的比较
Gut. 2004 Sep;53(9):1329-33. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.039032.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.亚洲结直肠肿瘤筛查及结直肠癌管理的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug 1;28(3):353-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03726.x.
7
Options for screening for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌筛查的选项。
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2003(237):13-6. doi: 10.1080/00855910310001421.
8
Clinical significance of small polyps found during screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy.乙状结肠镜筛查中发现的小息肉的临床意义。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002 Jan;12(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5157(03)00056-4.
9
Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.比较结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查及粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)用于结直肠癌筛查的就诊率和检出率。
Gastroenterology. 2007 Jun;132(7):2304-12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.030. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
10
Diagnostic yield in a biennial Hemoccult-II screening program compared to a once-only screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy and Hemoccult-II.与仅进行一次乙状结肠镜检查和隐血试验-II的筛查相比,两年一次的隐血试验-II筛查计划的诊断率。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jan;38(1):114-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical harms in colorectal cancer screening: An overview of the reporting in systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials.结直肠癌筛查中的身体伤害:系统评价和随机对照试验报告综述
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 11;20(9):e0331104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331104. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜筛查与乙状结肠镜筛查在结直肠癌中的效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007.
3
Alarming endoscopic data in young and older asymptomatic people: Results of an open access, unlimited age colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.
年轻和老年无症状人群中令人担忧的内镜检查数据:一项开放获取、不限年龄的结直肠癌结肠镜筛查结果
Mol Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;12(2):179-185. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1967. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.英国胃肠病学会/英国大肠直肠外科学会/英国公共卫生署息肉切除术后和结直肠癌切除术后监测指南。
Gut. 2020 Feb;69(2):201-223. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
5
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.粪便检测、乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 2;9(10):e032773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032773.
6
Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples.评估存档粪便样本中的肠道微生物群谱。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 8;18(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0896-6.
7
Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results.结直肠癌筛查中的建模:使用 NORCCAP 试验结果评估 MISCAN-Colon 微观模拟模型的外部和预测有效性。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):917-929. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18806497. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
8
The B-ADENOMA Study: Bowelscope - Accuracy of Detection using Endocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities: Study Protocol for randomised controlled trial.B-腺瘤研究:使用内套优化黏膜异常的肠道镜检查检测准确性:随机对照试验研究方案
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jul;6(7):E872-E877. doi: 10.1055/a-0591-9308. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies.结肠镜检查在结直肠癌筛查中的应用:不同结肠镜检查转诊策略的影响。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 May;33(5):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0404-x. Epub 2018 May 12.
10
Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial.结肠镜筛查对女性和男性结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的长期效果:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jun 5;168(11):775-782. doi: 10.7326/M17-1441. Epub 2018 Apr 24.