Luoma M-L, Hakamies-Blomqvist L, Sjöström J, Pluzanska A, Ottoson S, Mouridsen H, Bengtsson N-O, Bergh J, Malmström P, Valvere V, Tennvall L, Blomqvist C
Department of Psychology, PO Box 9 (Siltavuorenpenger 20D), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
Eur J Cancer. 2003 Jul;39(10):1370-6. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00775-x.
The purpose of the study was to investigate whether baseline quality of life (QoL) and changes in QoL scores from baseline are prognostic for time to progression (TTP) and/or overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Survival curves and probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both the univariate and multivariate analyses to explore relationships between baseline QoL variables and TTP, as well as OS. In the univariate analysis, more severe pain and fatigue at baseline were predictive for a shorter OS; global QoL, physical functioning and appetite loss had a borderline significance (P=0.0130 for global QoL; P=0.0256 for physical functioning: P=0.0149 for appetite loss). World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was significantly predictive for OS. In the multivariate analysis, more severe pain at baseline was predictive for a shorter OS. In contrast, baseline QoL had no prognostic value for the duration of TTP. QoL change scores from baseline QoL predicted neither OS nor TTP. Our findings suggest that while QoL measurements are important in evaluating patients' QoL, they have no great importance in predicting primary clinical endpoints such as TTP or OS in advanced breast cancer patients.
本研究的目的是调查接受多西他赛(T)或序贯甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶(MF)治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者的基线生活质量(QoL)以及QoL评分相对于基线的变化是否可预测疾病进展时间(TTP)和/或总生存期(OS)。在基线时以及每次治疗前使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对QoL进行评估。使用Kaplan-Meier技术估计生存曲线和概率。采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行单变量和多变量分析,以探讨基线QoL变量与TTP以及OS之间的关系。在单变量分析中,基线时更严重的疼痛和疲劳预示着较短的OS;总体QoL、身体功能和食欲减退具有临界显著性(总体QoL,P = 0.0130;身体功能,P = 0.0256;食欲减退,P = 0.0149)。世界卫生组织(WHO)的体能状态对OS有显著预测作用。在多变量分析中,基线时更严重的疼痛预示着较短的OS。相比之下,基线QoL对TTP持续时间没有预后价值。相对于基线QoL的QoL变化评分既不能预测OS也不能预测TTP。我们的研究结果表明,虽然QoL测量在评估患者QoL方面很重要,但它们在预测晚期乳腺癌患者的主要临床终点(如TTP或OS)方面并不十分重要。