Ethier Christian, Imbeault Marie-Andrée, Ung Visal, Capaday Charles
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Centre de Recherche Université Laval-Robert Giffard, Québec, G1J 2G3, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Aug;151(3):420-5. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1532-3. Epub 2003 Jun 26.
In a recent paper it was claimed that in the majority (9/15) of subjects studied the soleus H-reflex increases progressively during the swing phase of walking. This pattern was at odds with our numerous observations made since 1986, as was the very large proportion of subjects reported to exhibit this pattern. We therefore reinvestigated the issue in an extensive series of experiments and detailed subsequent analysis on 21 subjects. In most subjects (13/21) the soleus H-reflex was completely inhibited during most or all of the swing phase (group A). In 8/21 subjects (group B) there was a small H-reflex mean 16% (SD=10.6%) of the value in quiet standing present during most or all of swing, but there was no systematic modulation pattern; the reflex amplitude fluctuated in a seemingly random manner. The difference between the two somewhat arbitrary groups could not be explained on the basis of greater electromyographic activity in the tibialis anterior (TA) during the swing phase or at the time of heel contact. However, by normalizing the mean level of TA activity to the peak level, the ratio was significantly greater for the group A subjects. This highlights the importance of reciprocal inhibition in accounting for the suppression of the soleus H-reflex in swing. In the discussion we emphasize that the presence of a small H-reflex during swing in the group B subjects is unlikely to have any functional role. What is of functional importance is the strong inhibition of the H-reflex during swing which reflects the ensemble of neural mechanisms at play to prevent the unwanted activation of the powerful ankle extensor muscles.
在最近的一篇论文中声称,在所研究的大多数(9/15)受试者中,比目鱼肌H反射在步行摆动期逐渐增加。这种模式与我们自1986年以来的众多观察结果不一致,报告显示出现这种模式的受试者比例也非常高。因此,我们在一系列广泛的实验中重新研究了这个问题,并对21名受试者进行了详细的后续分析。在大多数受试者(13/21)中,比目鱼肌H反射在大部分或全部摆动期完全被抑制(A组)。在8/21名受试者(B组)中,在大部分或全部摆动期存在较小的H反射,平均为安静站立时值的16%(标准差=10.6%),但没有系统的调制模式;反射幅度以看似随机的方式波动。这两个有些随意划分的组之间的差异不能基于摆动期或足跟接触时胫骨前肌(TA)更大的肌电图活动来解释。然而,通过将TA活动的平均水平归一化为峰值水平,A组受试者的该比率显著更高。这突出了交互抑制在解释摆动期比目鱼肌H反射抑制中的重要性。在讨论中,我们强调B组受试者在摆动期存在较小的H反射不太可能有任何功能作用。具有功能重要性的是摆动期H反射的强烈抑制,这反映了起作用的神经机制整体,以防止强大的踝伸肌肌肉出现不必要的激活。