Jernigan John A, Pullen Amy L, Partin Clyde, Jarvis William R
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;24(6):445-50. doi: 10.1086/502223.
To determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization in an outpatient population and to identify risk factors for MRSA colonization.
Surveillance cultures were performed during outpatient visits to identify S. aureus colonization. A case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for MRSA colonization.
Primary care internal medicine clinic.
Adults presenting for non-acute primary care (N = 494).
S. aureus was isolated from 122 (24.7%) of the patients for whom cultures were performed. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus was isolated from 107 (21.7%) of the patients, whereas MRSA was isolated from 15 (3.0%) of the patients. All MRSA isolates were resistant to multiple non-beta-lactam antimicrobial agents. In multivariate analyses, MRSA colonization was independently associated with admission to a nursing home (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 103; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 7 to 999) or hospital in the previous year, although the association with hospital admission was observed only among those without chronic illness (adjusted OR, 7.1; CI95, 1.3 to 38.1). In addition, MRSA colonization was associated with the presence of at least one underlying chronic illness, although this association was observed only among those who had not been hospitalized in the previous year (adjusted OR, 5.1; CI95, 1.2 to 21.9).
We found a low prevalence of MRSA colonization in an adult outpatient population. MRSA carriers most likely acquired the organism through contact with healthcare facilities rather than in the community. These data show that care must be taken when attributing MRSA colonization to the community if detected in outpatients or during the first 24 to 48 hours of hospitalization.
确定门诊人群中甲氧西林耐药金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植的患病率,并识别MRSA定植的危险因素。
在门诊就诊期间进行监测培养以识别金黄色葡萄球菌定植情况。开展病例对照研究以识别MRSA定植的危险因素。
基层医疗内科诊所。
因非急性基层医疗就诊的成年人(N = 494)。
在进行培养的患者中,122例(24.7%)分离出金黄色葡萄球菌。107例(21.7%)患者分离出甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌,而15例(3.0%)患者分离出MRSA。所有MRSA分离株对多种非β-内酰胺类抗菌药物耐药。在多变量分析中,MRSA定植与前一年入住养老院(调整优势比[OR],103;95%置信区间[CI95],7至999)或医院独立相关,尽管仅在无慢性病的患者中观察到与住院的关联(调整OR,7.1;CI95,1.3至38.1)。此外,MRSA定植与至少一种潜在慢性病的存在相关,尽管仅在过去一年未住院的患者中观察到这种关联(调整OR,5.1;CI95,1.2至21.9)。
我们发现成年门诊人群中MRSA定植的患病率较低。MRSA携带者很可能是通过接触医疗机构而非在社区中获得该病菌。这些数据表明,在门诊患者或住院的最初24至48小时内检测到MRSA定植并将其归因于社区时必须谨慎。