• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国食管癌患者接受放射治疗的实践情况:1996 - 1999年医疗模式研究结果

The national practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1996-1999 Patterns of Care Study.

作者信息

Suntharalingam Mohan, Moughan Jennifer, Coia Lawrence R, Krasna Mark J, Kachnic Lisa, Haller Daniel G, Willett Christopher G, John Madhu J, Minsky Bruce D, Owen Jean B

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 15;56(4):981-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00256-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00256-6
PMID:12829133
Abstract

PURPOSE

A Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted to evaluate the standards of practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for esophageal cancer from 1996 to 1999. This study examined the evaluation and treatment schemes used during this time and compared these results to the PCS data obtained between 1992 and 1994 to identify any fundamental changes in national practice.

METHODS

A national survey was conducted using a two-stage cluster sampling technique. Specific information was collected on 414 patients with esophageal cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management at 59 institutions. Patients were staged according to the 1983 AJCC. Eligibility criteria for case review included RT between 1996 and 1999, no evidence of distant metastasis (including CT evidence of either supraclavicular or celiac nodes >1 cm), squamous cell or adenocarcinoma histology, Karnofsky performance status >60, tumors in the thoracic esophagus with <2 cm extension into the stomach, and no prior malignancies within the last 5 years. Statistical analysis was performed on the database using SUDAAN software to accurately reflect the type of sampling technique used by PCS. For the purpose of this analysis, institutions were stratified as either large or small based on the number of new cases seen each year. For the purposes of comparison, the 1992-1994 PCS esophageal survey results were subjected to the same statistical procedures and tests.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 64 years. Seventy-seven percent were male, and 23% were female. Karnofsky performance status was >or=80% in 85% of patients. The racial profile mirrors the previous survey with 75% Caucasian, 21% African-American, 3% Asian, and <1% Hispanic. A review of the histology revealed a nearly 50:50 split between squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. Sixteen percent were clinical Stage I, 39% clinical Stage II, and 33% clinical Stage III according to the 1983 AJCC system. Workup included endoscopy (96%), CT of the chest (87%), CT of the abdomen (75%), and esophagram (64%). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used in 18% of cases as compared to <2% in the original survey (p < 0.0001). Patients treated at large centers were more likely to undergo EUS than those treated at small centers (23% vs. 12%, p = 0.047). Fifty-six percent of patients received concurrent chemoradiation as definitive treatment. There was a significant increase in the use of concurrent chemoradiation before planned surgical resection as compared to the original survey (27% vs. 10%, p = 0.007). Other schemes included RT alone (10%), postoperative RT (1%), and postoperative chemoradiation (5%). Forty-six percent of patients with adenocarcinoma underwent trimodality therapy as compared to 19% with squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.0002). Patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation were more likely to have had an EUS. The median total dose of external RT was 50.4 Gy, and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 Gy. Brachytherapy was used in 6% of cases. The chemotherapy agents most commonly used included 5-fluorouracil (82%), cisplatin (67%), and paclitaxel (22%). Paclitaxel was more commonly employed as part of a preoperative chemoradiation regimen than in the setting of definitive chemoradiation (46% vs. 12%, p = 0.03). Compared to the original survey, paclitaxel use significantly increased between 1996 and 1999 (0.2% vs. 22%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Patterns of Care Survey confirms the use of concurrent chemoradiation as part of the national standards of practice for the management of esophageal cancer patients. A comparison with the previous study documents the significant rise in the use of EUS, preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery, and the increasing use of paclitaxel as part of a combined modality regimen.

摘要

目的

开展一项治疗模式研究(PCS),以评估1996年至1999年期间接受食管癌放射治疗患者的实践标准。本研究考察了这一时期所采用的评估和治疗方案,并将这些结果与1992年至1994年获得的PCS数据进行比较,以确定全国实践中的任何根本性变化。

方法

采用两阶段整群抽样技术进行全国性调查。收集了59家机构中414例接受放射治疗(RT)作为确定性或辅助性治疗一部分的食管癌患者的具体信息。患者根据1983年美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)进行分期。病例审查的纳入标准包括1996年至1999年期间接受放疗、无远处转移证据(包括锁骨上或腹腔淋巴结CT显示>1 cm)、鳞状细胞或腺癌组织学类型、卡诺夫斯基功能状态>60、胸段食管癌侵犯胃<2 cm且过去5年内无既往恶性肿瘤。使用SUDAAN软件对数据库进行统计分析,以准确反映PCS所采用的抽样技术类型。为了本次分析的目的,根据每年新病例数量将机构分为大型或小型。为了进行比较,对1992 - 1994年PCS食管癌调查结果进行相同的统计程序和检验。

结果

患者的中位年龄为64岁。77%为男性,23%为女性。85%的患者卡诺夫斯基功能状态≥80%。种族分布与之前的调查相似,75%为白种人,21%为非裔美国人,3%为亚洲人,<1%为西班牙裔。组织学检查显示鳞状细胞癌和腺癌几乎各占一半。根据1983年AJCC系统,16%为临床I期,39%为临床II期,33%为临床III期。检查包括内镜检查(96%)、胸部CT(87%)、腹部CT(75%)和食管造影(64%)。18%的病例使用了内镜超声(EUS),而原调查中这一比例<2%(p < 0.0001)。在大型中心接受治疗的患者比在小型中心接受治疗的患者更有可能接受EUS检查(23%对12%,p = 0.047)。56%的患者接受同步放化疗作为确定性治疗。与原调查相比,计划手术切除前同步放化疗的使用显著增加(27%对10%,p = 0.007)。其他方案包括单纯放疗(10%)、术后放疗(1%)和术后同步放化疗(5%)。46%的腺癌患者接受了三联疗法,而鳞状细胞癌患者为19%(p = 0.0002)。接受术前同步放化疗的患者更有可能接受过EUS检查。外照射放疗的中位总剂量为50.4 Gy,中位分次剂量为1.8 Gy。6%的病例使用了近距离放疗。最常用的化疗药物包括5 - 氟尿嘧啶(82%)、顺铂(67%)和紫杉醇(22%)。与确定性放化疗相比,紫杉醇更常用于术前同步放化疗方案(46%对12%,p = 0.03)。与原调查相比,1996年至1999年期间紫杉醇的使用显著增加(0.2%对22%,p = 0.001)。

结论

治疗模式调查证实同步放化疗作为食管癌患者管理国家标准的一部分被采用。与之前的研究相比,记录了EUS使用、术前同步放化疗后手术以及紫杉醇作为联合治疗方案一部分使用的显著增加。

相似文献

1
The national practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1996-1999 Patterns of Care Study.全国食管癌患者接受放射治疗的实践情况:1996 - 1999年医疗模式研究结果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 15;56(4):981-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00256-6.
2
The evaluation and treatment of patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.接受食管癌放射治疗患者的评估与治疗:1992 - 1994年医疗模式研究结果
Cancer. 1999 Jun 15;85(12):2499-505. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990615)85:12<2499::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-t.
3
Outcome of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.接受放射治疗的食管癌患者的治疗结果:1992 - 1994年医疗模式研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(3):455-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.455.
4
Esophagectomy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves locoregional control in clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer patients.同步放化疗后行食管癌切除术可改善临床II期或III期食管癌患者的局部区域控制。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Dec 1;60(5):1484-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.056.
5
Evaluation and treatment of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the rectum or sigmoid colon in the United States: results of the 1988-1989 Patterns of Care Study process survey.美国直肠癌或乙状结肠癌放疗患者的评估与治疗:1988 - 1989年医疗模式研究流程调查结果
J Clin Oncol. 1994 May;12(5):954-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.5.954.
6
Intensive chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.对于食管鳞状细胞癌和腺癌,先行强化放化疗,然后进行食管切除术。
Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 May-Jun;3(3):144-52.
7
Radiation therapy for esophageal cancer in Japan: results of the Patterns of Care Study 1999-2001.日本食管癌的放射治疗:1999 - 2001年治疗模式研究结果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Oct 1;75(2):357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.073.
8
Process and preliminary outcome of a patterns-of-care study of esophageal cancer in Japan: patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy.日本食管癌治疗模式研究的过程与初步结果:接受手术和放疗的患者
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 1;56(3):813-22. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00128-7.
9
Mature survival results with preoperative cisplatin, protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil, and 44-Gy radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.术前顺铂、持续输注5-氟尿嘧啶和44Gy放疗用于食管癌的成熟生存结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jun 1;56(2):328-34. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04598-4.
10
Phase II evaluation of preoperative chemoradiation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.食管癌鳞状细胞癌和腺癌术前放化疗及术后辅助化疗的II期评估
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(4):868-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.4.868.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Management of Dysphagia in Patients with Inoperable Esophageal Cancer: Current Perspectives.不可切除食管癌患者吞咽困难的优化管理:当前观点
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Nov 23;14:3281-3291. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S362666. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparative clinical studies of primary chemoradiotherapy versus S-1 and nedaplatin chemotherapy against stage IVb oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial.比较 S-1 联合奈达铂化疗与同期放化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌的多中心、开放、随机对照临床研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 25;12(4):e055273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055273.
3
Radiotherapy Combined With Concurrent Nedaplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Stage II-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
放疗联合基于奈达铂的同步化疗治疗Ⅱ-Ⅲ期食管鳞状细胞癌
Dose Response. 2022 Mar 3;20(1):15593258221076720. doi: 10.1177/15593258221076720. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
4
Factors affecting survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Single-center experience.影响食管鳞状细胞癌生存的因素:单中心经验
North Clin Istanb. 2019 Nov 29;7(3):267-274. doi: 10.14744/nci.2019.31384. eCollection 2020.
5
Evaluating the eighth edition TNM staging system for esophageal cancer among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: A SEER study.评估接受新辅助治疗的食管癌患者的第八版 TNM 分期系统:一项 SEER 研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4648-4655. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2997. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Nedaplatin-based chemotherapy regimens combined with concurrent radiotherapy as first-line treatment for stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.以奈达铂为基础的化疗方案联合同期放疗作为II-III期食管鳞状细胞癌的一线治疗方案。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jan;17(1):594-602. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9564. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
Treatment for unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer: current evidence and trends.不可切除或转移性食管癌症的治疗:当前证据和趋势。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;15(4):235-249. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.162. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Shifting practice in definitive chemoradiation for localized esophageal cancer.局部食管癌确定性放化疗的实践转变
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):e379-e387. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3677. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
9
Intraepithelial lymphocytes, scores, mimickers and challenges in diagnosing gluten-sensitive enteropathy (celiac disease).上皮内淋巴细胞、评分、诊断麸质敏感性肠病(乳糜泻)中的模仿者及挑战
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 28;23(4):573-589. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.573.
10
A Meta-Analysis of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer.晚期食管癌同步放化疗的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):e0128616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128616. eCollection 2015.