Suntharalingam Mohan, Moughan Jennifer, Coia Lawrence R, Krasna Mark J, Kachnic Lisa, Haller Daniel G, Willett Christopher G, John Madhu J, Minsky Bruce D, Owen Jean B
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 15;56(4):981-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00256-6.
A Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted to evaluate the standards of practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for esophageal cancer from 1996 to 1999. This study examined the evaluation and treatment schemes used during this time and compared these results to the PCS data obtained between 1992 and 1994 to identify any fundamental changes in national practice.
A national survey was conducted using a two-stage cluster sampling technique. Specific information was collected on 414 patients with esophageal cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management at 59 institutions. Patients were staged according to the 1983 AJCC. Eligibility criteria for case review included RT between 1996 and 1999, no evidence of distant metastasis (including CT evidence of either supraclavicular or celiac nodes >1 cm), squamous cell or adenocarcinoma histology, Karnofsky performance status >60, tumors in the thoracic esophagus with <2 cm extension into the stomach, and no prior malignancies within the last 5 years. Statistical analysis was performed on the database using SUDAAN software to accurately reflect the type of sampling technique used by PCS. For the purpose of this analysis, institutions were stratified as either large or small based on the number of new cases seen each year. For the purposes of comparison, the 1992-1994 PCS esophageal survey results were subjected to the same statistical procedures and tests.
The median age of patients was 64 years. Seventy-seven percent were male, and 23% were female. Karnofsky performance status was >or=80% in 85% of patients. The racial profile mirrors the previous survey with 75% Caucasian, 21% African-American, 3% Asian, and <1% Hispanic. A review of the histology revealed a nearly 50:50 split between squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. Sixteen percent were clinical Stage I, 39% clinical Stage II, and 33% clinical Stage III according to the 1983 AJCC system. Workup included endoscopy (96%), CT of the chest (87%), CT of the abdomen (75%), and esophagram (64%). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used in 18% of cases as compared to <2% in the original survey (p < 0.0001). Patients treated at large centers were more likely to undergo EUS than those treated at small centers (23% vs. 12%, p = 0.047). Fifty-six percent of patients received concurrent chemoradiation as definitive treatment. There was a significant increase in the use of concurrent chemoradiation before planned surgical resection as compared to the original survey (27% vs. 10%, p = 0.007). Other schemes included RT alone (10%), postoperative RT (1%), and postoperative chemoradiation (5%). Forty-six percent of patients with adenocarcinoma underwent trimodality therapy as compared to 19% with squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.0002). Patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation were more likely to have had an EUS. The median total dose of external RT was 50.4 Gy, and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 Gy. Brachytherapy was used in 6% of cases. The chemotherapy agents most commonly used included 5-fluorouracil (82%), cisplatin (67%), and paclitaxel (22%). Paclitaxel was more commonly employed as part of a preoperative chemoradiation regimen than in the setting of definitive chemoradiation (46% vs. 12%, p = 0.03). Compared to the original survey, paclitaxel use significantly increased between 1996 and 1999 (0.2% vs. 22%, p = 0.001).
The Patterns of Care Survey confirms the use of concurrent chemoradiation as part of the national standards of practice for the management of esophageal cancer patients. A comparison with the previous study documents the significant rise in the use of EUS, preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery, and the increasing use of paclitaxel as part of a combined modality regimen.
开展一项治疗模式研究(PCS),以评估1996年至1999年期间接受食管癌放射治疗患者的实践标准。本研究考察了这一时期所采用的评估和治疗方案,并将这些结果与1992年至1994年获得的PCS数据进行比较,以确定全国实践中的任何根本性变化。
采用两阶段整群抽样技术进行全国性调查。收集了59家机构中414例接受放射治疗(RT)作为确定性或辅助性治疗一部分的食管癌患者的具体信息。患者根据1983年美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)进行分期。病例审查的纳入标准包括1996年至1999年期间接受放疗、无远处转移证据(包括锁骨上或腹腔淋巴结CT显示>1 cm)、鳞状细胞或腺癌组织学类型、卡诺夫斯基功能状态>60、胸段食管癌侵犯胃<2 cm且过去5年内无既往恶性肿瘤。使用SUDAAN软件对数据库进行统计分析,以准确反映PCS所采用的抽样技术类型。为了本次分析的目的,根据每年新病例数量将机构分为大型或小型。为了进行比较,对1992 - 1994年PCS食管癌调查结果进行相同的统计程序和检验。
患者的中位年龄为64岁。77%为男性,23%为女性。85%的患者卡诺夫斯基功能状态≥80%。种族分布与之前的调查相似,75%为白种人,21%为非裔美国人,3%为亚洲人,<1%为西班牙裔。组织学检查显示鳞状细胞癌和腺癌几乎各占一半。根据1983年AJCC系统,16%为临床I期,39%为临床II期,33%为临床III期。检查包括内镜检查(96%)、胸部CT(87%)、腹部CT(75%)和食管造影(64%)。18%的病例使用了内镜超声(EUS),而原调查中这一比例<2%(p < 0.0001)。在大型中心接受治疗的患者比在小型中心接受治疗的患者更有可能接受EUS检查(23%对12%,p = 0.047)。56%的患者接受同步放化疗作为确定性治疗。与原调查相比,计划手术切除前同步放化疗的使用显著增加(27%对10%,p = 0.007)。其他方案包括单纯放疗(10%)、术后放疗(1%)和术后同步放化疗(5%)。46%的腺癌患者接受了三联疗法,而鳞状细胞癌患者为19%(p = 0.0002)。接受术前同步放化疗的患者更有可能接受过EUS检查。外照射放疗的中位总剂量为50.4 Gy,中位分次剂量为1.8 Gy。6%的病例使用了近距离放疗。最常用的化疗药物包括5 - 氟尿嘧啶(82%)、顺铂(67%)和紫杉醇(22%)。与确定性放化疗相比,紫杉醇更常用于术前同步放化疗方案(46%对12%,p = 0.03)。与原调查相比,1996年至1999年期间紫杉醇的使用显著增加(0.2%对22%,p = 0.001)。
治疗模式调查证实同步放化疗作为食管癌患者管理国家标准的一部分被采用。与之前的研究相比,记录了EUS使用、术前同步放化疗后手术以及紫杉醇作为联合治疗方案一部分使用的显著增加。