• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与替罗非班用于卒中溶栓的初步观察

Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and tirofiban in stroke: preliminary observations.

作者信息

Seitz Rüdiger J, Hamzavi Magnolia, Junghans Ulrich, Ringleb Peter A, Schranz Corinna, Siebler Mario

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):1932-5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000080535.61188.A6. Epub 2003 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1161/01.STR.0000080535.61188.A6
PMID:12829861
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We sought to investigate the feasibility of the combined use of low-dose recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) receptor antagonist, for systemic thrombolysis in acute stroke.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who were treated with systemic application of low-dose rtPA and body weight-adjusted tirofiban (rtPA+T group; n=37) were evaluated retrospectively during 1999-2001. Patients in the rtPA+T group were compared with a group of patients treated with a dose of 0.9 mg/kg body weight in a different center (rtPA group; n=119). The 41 patients with infarctions of the middle cerebral artery territory who were not eligible for thrombolytic treatment because of medical contraindications or arrival in the hospital >3 hours after stroke onset served as controls. For matched comparisons, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission and the Rankin Scale on discharge 5 days after stroke were used.

RESULTS

The patients treated with rtPA+T or rtPA improved (P<0.05) compared with the controls at discharge; patients in the rtPA+T and rtPA groups reached a Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 in 63% and 55%, respectively, while only 16% of the controls achieved this score. Death rates (8% in rtPA+T group and 5% in rtPA group) were similar among the 2 treatment groups. They included 1 fatal hemorrhage in the rtPA+T group and 4 fatal hemorrhages in the rtPA group. Five percent of the untreated patients developed symptomatic, nonfatal cerebral hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic combined thrombolysis with rtPA+T seems to be a feasible treatment in acute stroke.

摘要

背景与目的

我们旨在研究低剂量重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)与糖蛋白IIb/IIIa(GPIIb/IIIa)受体拮抗剂替罗非班联合用于急性卒中全身溶栓的可行性。

方法

回顾性评估1999年至2001年期间连续接受低剂量rtPA全身应用及根据体重调整剂量的替罗非班治疗的患者(rtPA + T组;n = 37)。将rtPA + T组患者与另一中心接受0.9 mg/kg体重剂量治疗的患者组(rtPA组;n = 119)进行比较。41例因医学禁忌或卒中发作后超过3小时入院而不符合溶栓治疗条件的大脑中动脉区域梗死患者作为对照。为进行匹配比较,使用了美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表入院时评分及卒中后5天出院时的Rankin量表评分。

结果

与对照组相比,接受rtPA + T或rtPA治疗的患者出院时病情改善(P < 0.05);rtPA + T组和rtPA组患者分别有63%和55%达到Rankin量表评分0至2,而对照组仅有16%达到该评分。两个治疗组的死亡率相似(rtPA + T组为8%,rtPA组为5%)。rtPA + T组有1例致命性出血,rtPA组有4例致命性出血。5%的未治疗患者发生有症状的非致命性脑出血。

结论

rtPA + T全身联合溶栓似乎是急性卒中的一种可行治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and tirofiban in stroke: preliminary observations.重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与替罗非班用于卒中溶栓的初步观察
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):1932-5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000080535.61188.A6. Epub 2003 Jun 26.
2
Systemic thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and tirofiban in acute middle cerebral artery occlusion.重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与替罗非班用于急性大脑中动脉闭塞的全身溶栓治疗
Stroke. 2004 Mar;35(3):705-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000117094.41638.EE. Epub 2004 Jan 29.
3
Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation.阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中合并心房颤动患者的溶栓治疗。
Neurol Res. 2010 May;32(4):353-8. doi: 10.1179/016164110X12656393665206.
4
Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban) followed by intra-arterial urokinase and mechanical thrombolysis in stroke.静脉注射糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂(替罗非班),随后进行动脉内尿激酶治疗及机械性血栓溶解治疗卒中。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(10):2595-601.
5
Comparison of combined venous and arterial thrombolysis with primary arterial therapy using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中中联合静脉和动脉溶栓与使用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂进行原发性动脉治疗的比较。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2007.12.004.
6
Acute stroke management in the elderly.老年人急性中风的管理
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(4):304-8. doi: 10.1159/000098332. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
7
Intra-arterial thrombectomy versus standard intravenous thrombolysis in patients with anterior circulation stroke caused by intracranial arterial occlusions: a single-center experience.颅内动脉闭塞性前循环卒中患者动脉内取栓与标准静脉溶栓治疗的单中心经验
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):e323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
8
Intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: preliminary experience with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as adjunctive therapy.急性缺血性卒中的动脉内溶栓治疗:血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂作为辅助治疗的初步经验。
Neurosurgery. 2005;56(1):46-54; discussion 54-5. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000145785.69942.b3.
9
Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in acute ischemic stroke after rtPA thrombolysis.rtPA溶栓后急性缺血性卒中的脑自动调节动力学
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(2):147-55. doi: 10.1159/000139662. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
10
Outcomes in mild acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis: a retrospective analysis of the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke registry.静脉溶栓治疗轻度急性缺血性脑卒中的结局:Get With The Guidelines-Stroke 注册研究的回顾性分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Apr;72(4):423-31. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4354.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety Landscape of Therapeutic Nanozymes and Future Research Directions.治疗性纳米酶的安全格局及未来研究方向
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Dec;11(46):e2407816. doi: 10.1002/advs.202407816. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Examining the Efficacy, Safety, and Future Prospects of Tirofiban in Managing Myocardial Infarction among Diabetic Patients.探讨替罗非班在管理糖尿病患者心肌梗死中的疗效、安全性及未来前景。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;21(2):e250124226177. doi: 10.2174/0115733998276043231225152605.
3
The Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban Use in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Intravenous Thrombolysis Applicable Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke-a Post Hoc Analysis from the Direct-MT Trial.
替罗非班用于血管内血栓切除术治疗大血管闭塞性卒中静脉溶栓适用患者的疗效和安全性:来自 DIRECT-MT 试验的事后分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Feb;47(2):208-215. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03540-9. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
Factors affecting the outcomes of tirofiban after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: Experience from a single center.影响急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗后替罗非班疗效的因素:单中心经验。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Mar;29(3):957-967. doi: 10.1111/cns.14058. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
5
Safety Profile and Complication Rates in Emergency Off-label Use of Tirofiban in Interventional Neuroradiology : An Observational Dual Center Study.替罗非班在介入神经放射学中紧急超适应证使用的安全性特征和并发症发生率:一项观察性的双中心研究。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;33(2):427-433. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01223-5. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Safety and efficacy of low-dose and long-course tirofiban in large hemispheric infarction.低剂量长疗程替罗非班治疗大脑半球大面积梗死的安全性与有效性
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 9;13:987859. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.987859. eCollection 2022.
7
Safety and efficacy of prophylactic tirofiban infusion for acute intracranial intraprocedural stent thrombosis.预防性替罗非班输注治疗急性颅内血管内支架内血栓形成的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 29;11(1):21326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00872-9.
8
Effects of Periprocedural Tirofiban vs. Oral Antiplatelet Drug Therapy on Posterior Circulation Infarction in Patients With Acute Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion.围手术期替罗非班与口服抗血小板药物治疗对急性颅内动脉粥样硬化相关椎基底动脉闭塞患者后循环梗死的影响
Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 15;11:254. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00254. eCollection 2020.
9
Tirofiban for acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;76(4):475-481. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02817-8. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
10
Intravenous tirofiban therapy for patients with capsular warning syndrome.静脉注射替罗非班治疗囊袋警告综合征患者。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2019 Jan 9;4(1):22-27. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000163. eCollection 2019 Mar.