Suppr超能文献

阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中合并心房颤动患者的溶栓治疗。

Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Zhang Jing-Bo, Ding Ze-Yu, Yang Ying, Sun Wei, Hai Feng, Sui Xin-Ning, Li Xue-Yuan, Wang Hong-Zhi, Wang Xin-Tao, Zheng Jin-Lian

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Third People's Hospital of Dalian, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Neurol Res. 2010 May;32(4):353-8. doi: 10.1179/016164110X12656393665206.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is known as the only approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke. However, it is still controversial whether acute ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation should receive rtPA therapy.

METHODS

We studied 99 patients altogether who belonged to three different groups based on the patient characteristics: (1) atrial fibrillation rtPA-treated group consisting of 22 ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rtPA within 4.5 hours after the onset of stroke; (2) atrial fibrillation non-rtPA-treated group consisting of 44 acute ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation matching in age and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS); (3) the non-atrial fibrillation rtPA-treated group consisting of 33 patients without atrial fibrillation treated with rtPA.

RESULTS

The median time for the administration of rtPA was 199.6 +/- 50.0 minutes. More patients had favorable outcomes (90 day modified Rankin Scale 0-1) in the atrial fibrillation rtPA-treated group than the atrial fibrillation non-rtPA-treated group (36.4 versus 13.6%; odds ratio=2.667; 95% confidence interval: 1.056-6.735; p=0.033). The mortality at day 90 was lower in the rtPA-treated group than the non-rtPA-treated group (18.2 versus 20.5%; p=0.827), although the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was higher (18.2 versus 6.8%; p=0.184). Patients in the atrial fibrillation rtPA-treated group had fewer favorable outcomes than non-atrial fibrillation rtPA-treated group (36.4 versus 51.6%; p=0.076), but their baseline NIHSS was higher (12.0 +/- 7.1 versus 9.1 +/- 7.3; p=0.161).

CONCLUSION

As compared with non-rtPA-treated patients, rtPA treated within 4.5 hours after the onset of stroke significantly improved clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients. Thrombolytic treatment increases intracranial hemorrhage rate but does not increase mortality.

摘要

目的

静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)是已知唯一获批用于急性缺血性卒中的治疗方法。然而,急性缺血性卒中合并心房颤动的患者是否应接受rtPA治疗仍存在争议。

方法

我们共研究了99例患者,根据患者特征将其分为三个不同组:(1)心房颤动rtPA治疗组,由22例缺血性卒中合并心房颤动且在卒中发作后4.5小时内接受rtPA治疗的患者组成;(2)心房颤动非rtPA治疗组,由44例年龄和基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)匹配的急性缺血性卒中合并心房颤动患者组成;(3)非心房颤动rtPA治疗组,由33例无心房颤动且接受rtPA治疗的患者组成。

结果

rtPA给药的中位时间为199.6±50.0分钟。心房颤动rtPA治疗组中获得良好预后(90天改良Rankin量表0 - 1级)的患者比心房颤动非rtPA治疗组更多(36.4%对13.6%;优势比=2.667;95%置信区间:1.056 - 6.735;p = 0.033)。rtPA治疗组90天时的死亡率低于非rtPA治疗组(18.2%对20.5%;p = 0.827),尽管症状性颅内出血的发生率更高(18.2%对6.8%;p = 0.184)。心房颤动rtPA治疗组患者获得良好预后的比例低于非心房颤动rtPA治疗组(36.4%对51.6%;p = 0.076),但其基线NIHSS更高(12.0±7.1对9.1±7.3;p = 0.161)。

结论

与未接受rtPA治疗的患者相比,卒中发作后4.5小时内接受rtPA治疗可显著改善心房颤动患者的临床预后。溶栓治疗会增加颅内出血率,但不会增加死亡率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验