Hamilton Matthew B, Braverman John M, Soria-Hernanz David F
Department of Biology, Georgetown University, USA.
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Oct;20(10):1710-21. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg190. Epub 2003 Jun 27.
Insertions and deletions (indels) in chloroplast noncoding regions are common genetic markers to estimate population structure and gene flow, although relatively little is known about indel evolution among recently diverged lineages such as within plant families. Because indel events tend to occur nonrandomly along DNA sequences, recurrent mutations may generate homoplasy for indel haplotypes. This is a potential problem for population studies, because indel haplotypes may be shared among populations after recurrent mutation as well as gene flow. Furthermore, indel haplotypes may differ in fitness and therefore be subject to natural selection detectable as rate heterogeneity among lineages. Such selection could contribute to the spatial patterning of cpDNA haplotypes, greatly complicating the interpretation of cpDNA population structure. This study examined both nucleotide and indel cpDNA variation and divergence at six noncoding regions (psbB-psbH, atpB-rbcL, trnL-trnH, rpl20-5'rps12, trnS-trnG, and trnH-psbA) in 16 individuals from eight species in the Lecythidaceae and a Sapotaceae outgroup. We described patterns of cpDNA changes, assessed the level of indel homoplasy, and tested for rate heterogeneity among lineages and regions. Although regression analysis of branch lengths suggested some degree of indel homoplasy among the most divergent lineages, there was little evidence for indel homoplasy within the Lecythidaceae. Likelihood ratio tests applied to the entire phylogenetic tree revealed a consistent pattern rejecting a molecular clock. Tajima's 1D and 2D tests revealed two taxa with consistent rate heterogeneity, one showing relatively more and one relatively fewer changes than other taxa. In general, nucleotide changes showed more evidence of rate heterogeneity than did indel changes. The rate of evolution was highly variable among the six cpDNA regions examined, with the trnS-trnG and trnH-psbA regions showing as much as 10% and 15% divergence within the Lecythidaceae. Deviations from rate homogeneity in the two taxa were constant across cpDNA regions, consistent with lineage-specific rates of evolution rather than cpDNA region-specific natural selection. There is no evidence that indels are more likely than nucleotide changes to experience homoplasy within the Lecythidaceae. These results support a neutral interpretation of cpDNA indel and nucleotide variation in population studies within species such as Corythophora alta.
叶绿体非编码区的插入和缺失(indels)是估计种群结构和基因流的常见遗传标记,尽管对于植物科内等最近分化的谱系间的插入缺失进化了解相对较少。由于插入缺失事件往往沿着DNA序列非随机发生,反复突变可能会导致插入缺失单倍型产生同塑现象。这对于种群研究来说是一个潜在问题,因为反复突变以及基因流之后,不同种群间可能会共享插入缺失单倍型。此外,插入缺失单倍型的适应性可能不同,因此可能会受到自然选择,表现为谱系间的速率异质性。这种选择可能会导致叶绿体DNA单倍型的空间格局形成,极大地复杂化了对叶绿体DNA种群结构的解释。本研究检测了玉蕊科8个物种的16个个体以及一个山榄科外类群的6个非编码区(psbB - psbH、atpB - rbcL、trnL - trnH、rpl20 - 5'rps12、trnS - trnG和trnH - psbA)的核苷酸和插入缺失叶绿体DNA变异及分化情况。我们描述了叶绿体DNA变化模式,评估了插入缺失同塑水平,并测试了谱系和区域间的速率异质性。尽管对分支长度的回归分析表明,在分歧最大的谱系间存在一定程度的插入缺失同塑现象,但在玉蕊科内几乎没有证据表明存在插入缺失同塑。应用于整个系统发育树的似然比检验揭示了一个一致的模式,即拒绝分子钟假说。 Tajima的1D和2D检验揭示了两个具有一致速率异质性的分类群,一个分类群的变化相对较多,另一个分类群的变化相对较少。总体而言,核苷酸变化比插入缺失变化表现出更多的速率异质性证据。在所检测的6个叶绿体DNA区域中,进化速率高度可变,其中trnS - trnG和trnH - psbA区域在玉蕊科内的分化高达10%和15%。这两个分类群偏离速率同质性的情况在叶绿体DNA区域间是恒定不变的,这与谱系特异性进化速率而非叶绿体DNA区域特异性自然选择一致。没有证据表明在玉蕊科内插入缺失比核苷酸变化更易出现同塑现象。这些结果支持在诸如高花玉蕊等物种的种群研究中对叶绿体DNA插入缺失和核苷酸变异进行中性解释。