• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整形外科医生与寻求隆胸手术的患者在乳房形状偏好上的差异。

Differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation.

作者信息

Hsia Henry C, Thomson J Grant

机构信息

Section of Plastic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn 06520, USA.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jul;112(1):312-20; discussion 321-2. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000066365.12348.A7.

DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000066365.12348.A7
PMID:12832909
Abstract

There has been little discussion in the published literature regarding breast shape preferences. This study was conducted to ascertain previously undocumented differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation, with respect to upper-pole contour. Sixty-six respondents, grouped into three cohort categories (plastic surgeons, breast augmentation patients, and lay people), were asked to evaluate a series of 12 nonptotic breast profiles representing a range of upper-pole contours. Five profiles exhibited convex upper-pole contours, five exhibited concave contours, and two exhibited upper poles with flat slopes. A five-point Likert-type scale was used to rate attractiveness, naturalness, how close the shape was to each respondent's personal ideal, and how close the shape was to what the respondent believed was our society's ideal. Statistical comparisons were made among the three cohorts. The plastic surgeon cohort (n = 11) rated concave upper-pole contours significantly higher than did the patient cohort (n = 13) for attractiveness, naturalness, and personal ideal (p < 0.01). For convex contours, the plastic surgeon cohort gave significantly lower scores than did the patient cohort (p < 0.01). The lay category (n = 42) demonstrated preferences intermediate between those of the other groups. There are no known studies in the literature documenting the breast shape preferences of plastic surgeons and their patients. This study suggests that plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation may have drastically different images in mind regarding what constitutes an attractive, natural, and ideal breast shape. These findings have potential implications for patient treatment and satisfaction.

摘要

已发表的文献中很少有关于乳房形状偏好的讨论。本研究旨在确定整形外科医生和寻求隆胸手术的患者在乳房形状偏好方面,在上极轮廓方面以前未被记录的差异。66名受访者被分为三个队列类别(整形外科医生、隆胸患者和普通人群),被要求评估一系列12个代表不同上极轮廓的非下垂乳房外形。五个外形呈现上极凸轮廓,五个呈现凹轮廓,两个呈现上极斜率平坦。采用五点李克特量表对吸引力、自然度、该形状与每个受访者个人理想的接近程度以及该形状与受访者认为的社会理想的接近程度进行评分。对三个队列进行了统计比较。整形外科医生队列(n = 11)对凹上极轮廓的吸引力、自然度和个人理想的评分显著高于患者队列(n = 13)(p < 0.01)。对于凸轮廓,整形外科医生队列给出的分数显著低于患者队列(p < 0.01)。普通人群类别(n = 42)的偏好介于其他两组之间。文献中尚无记录整形外科医生及其患者乳房形状偏好的研究。本研究表明,整形外科医生和寻求隆胸手术的患者在构成有吸引力、自然和理想乳房形状的概念上可能有截然不同的想法。这些发现对患者治疗和满意度有潜在影响。

相似文献

1
Differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation.整形外科医生与寻求隆胸手术的患者在乳房形状偏好上的差异。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jul;112(1):312-20; discussion 321-2. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000066365.12348.A7.
2
Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons.整形外科医生对美观乳房形状的偏好。
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;74(6):639-44. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000001.
3
Evaluation of anatomical and round breast implant aesthetics and preferences in Dutch young lay and plastic surgeon cohort.荷兰年轻非专业人士和整形外科医生群体对解剖型和圆形乳房植入物美学及偏好的评估。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Aug;71(8):1116-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.一期隆乳联合乳房上提术:美学效果与患者满意度
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;28(5):259-67. doi: 10.1007/s00266-004-0032-6. Epub 2004 Nov 5.
5
Comparative double blind clinical study on round versus shaped cohesive gel implants.圆形与成形性粘性凝胶乳房植入物的双盲对照临床研究
Aesthet Surg J. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2006.08.004.
6
Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast.美学乳房尺寸概念:理想乳房分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Jan;65(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
7
Round versus Anatomical Implants in Primary Cosmetic Breast Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.圆形假体与解剖型假体在原发性美容隆乳术中的应用:Meta 分析和系统评价。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar;143(3):711-721. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005371.
8
[Evaluation of the psychological benefits of breast augmentation for aesthetic purposes. Results of a multicenter prospective study of a series of 181 patients].[评估出于美学目的隆胸的心理益处。对181例患者的多中心前瞻性系列研究结果]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2013 Feb;58(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
9
Psychological considerations in cosmetic breast augmentation.隆胸手术中的心理因素
Plast Surg Nurs. 2007 Jul-Sep;27(3):146-54. doi: 10.1097/01.PSN.0000290284.49982.0c.
10
Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.初次美容隆乳术中的双峰轮廓:发生率、预防及治疗
Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Apr;64(4):390-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b14284.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Augmentation Preferences and Concerns Among Chinese Women: A Nationwide Multicenter Study of 2066 Cases.中国女性隆胸的偏好与担忧:一项针对2066例病例的全国多中心研究
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jan;49(2):528-537. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04275-9. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Exploring the Ideal of Breast Beauty: A Morphometric Analysis Based on the Opinions of the Brazilian Population.探索乳房美的理想标准:基于巴西人群观点的形态学分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jan;49(1):147-155. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04184-x. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Breast Reduction with Implants or Augmentation Reduction: Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
乳房缩小术联合假体植入或隆乳缩小术:单中心回顾性队列分析的患者报告结局。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 29;60(5):743. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050743.
4
Aesthetically Ideal Breasts Created With Artificial Intelligence: Validating the Literature, Racial Differences, and Deep Fakes.用人工智能塑造的美学理想乳房:验证文献、种族差异及深度伪造技术
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Jan 30;6:ojae006. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae006. eCollection 2024.
5
The transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap (TMG) for breast reconstruction: ipsi vs. contralateral harvest-aesthetic outcome and refinement procedures.横行股薄肌肌皮瓣(TMG)用于乳房再造:同侧 vs. 对侧取瓣-美学效果和改良手术。
Breast Cancer. 2023 Sep;30(5):845-855. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01478-x. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
6
Definitions of Abnormal Breast Size and Asymmetry: A Cohort Study of 400 Women.乳房大小和不对称的定义:一项 400 名女性的队列研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2242-2252. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03400-4. Epub 2023 May 30.
7
How Useful Is the SSN-Nipple Distance? An Analytical Questionnaire Survey on Anthropometric Measurements for the Aesthetically Ideal Positioning of the Nipple-Areolar Complex.社会安全号码与乳头距离有何用处?一项关于人体测量学的分析问卷调查,旨在确定乳头乳晕复合体美学理想定位的相关测量指标。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 25;12(7):2494. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072494.
8
Aesthetic Characteristics of the Ideal Female Breast.理想女性乳房的美学特征。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jan 20;11(1):e4770. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004770. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
An updated systematic review of esthetic grading tools in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.乳房重建术后美学评价工具的更新系统评价
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;127(5):782-790. doi: 10.1002/jso.27186. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Three-dimensional Evaluation of Results After Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation with and Without Internal Suture Mastopexy.双平面隆乳术联合或不联合内部缝合乳房固定术效果的三维评估
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1303-1311. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03200-2. Epub 2022 Dec 1.