Archak S, Gaikwad A B, Gautam D, Rao E V V B, Swamy K R M, Karihaloo J L
National Research Centre on DNA Fingerprinting, NBPGR, New Delhi, 110012 India.
Genome. 2003 Jun;46(3):362-9. doi: 10.1139/g03-016.
Nineteen cashew accessions were analysed with 50 random primers, 12 ISSR primers and 6 AFLP primer pairs to compare the efficiency and utility of these techniques for detecting variation in cashew germplasm. Each marker system could discriminate between all of the accessions, albeit with varied efficiency of polymorphism detection. AFLP exhibited maximum discrimination efficiency with a genotype index of 1. The utility of each molecular marker technique, expressed as marker index, was estimated as a function of average band informativeness and effective multiplex ratio. Marker index was calculated to be more than 10 times higher in AFLP than in RAPD and ISSR. Similarity matrices were determined based on the data generated by molecular and morphometric analyses, and compared for congruency. AFLP displayed no correspondence with RAPD and ISSR. Correlation between ISSR and RAPD similarity matrices was low but significant (r = 0.63; p < 0.005). The similarity matrix based on morphometric markers exhibited no correlation with any of the molecular markers. AFLP, with its superior marker utility, was concluded to be the marker of choice for cashew genetic analysis.
使用50个随机引物、12个ISSR引物和6对AFLP引物对19份腰果种质进行分析,以比较这些技术在检测腰果种质变异方面的效率和实用性。每个标记系统都能区分所有种质,尽管多态性检测效率各不相同。AFLP表现出最高的区分效率,基因型指数为1。以标记指数表示的每种分子标记技术的实用性,是根据平均条带信息量和有效多重化率来估计的。计算得出AFLP的标记指数比RAPD和ISSR高出10倍以上。基于分子和形态分析产生的数据确定相似性矩阵,并比较其一致性。AFLP与RAPD和ISSR没有对应关系。ISSR和RAPD相似性矩阵之间的相关性较低,但具有显著性(r = 0.63;p < 0.005)。基于形态标记的相似性矩阵与任何分子标记均无相关性。由于AFLP具有卓越的标记实用性,因此得出结论,它是腰果遗传分析的首选标记。