Visvanathan Renuka, Macintosh Caroline, Callary Mandy, Penhall Robert, Horowitz Michael, Chapman Ian
Department of Geriatric and Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul;51(7):1007-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51317.x.
To identify predictors and consequences of nutritional risk, as determined by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), in older recipients of domiciliary care services living at home.
Baseline analysis of subject characteristics with low MNA scores (<24) and follow-up of the consequences of these low scores.
South Australia.
Two hundred fifty domiciliary care clients (aged 67-99, 173 women).
Baseline history and nutritional status were determined. Information about hospitalization was obtained at follow-up 12 months later.
Letters suggesting nutritional intervention were sent to general practitioners of subjects not well nourished.
At baseline, 56.8% were well nourished, 38.4% were at risk of malnutrition, and 4.8% were malnourished (43.2% not well nourished). Independent predictors of low MNA scores (<24) were living alone, and the physical and mental component scales of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Follow-up information was obtained for 240 subjects (96%). In the ensuing year not well-nourished subjects were more likely than well-nourished subjects to have been admitted to the hospital (risk ratio (RR) = 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07-2.14), have two or more emergency hospital admissions (RR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.15-7.59), spend more than 4 weeks in the hospital (RR = 3.22, 95% CI = 1.29-8.07), fall (RR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.13-2.41), and report weight loss (RR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.67-4.15).
The MNA identified a large number of subjects with impaired nutrition who did significantly worse than well-nourished subjects during the following year. Studies are needed to determine whether nutritional or other interventions in people with low MNA scores can improve clinical outcomes.
确定居家接受居家护理服务的老年人中,由微型营养评定法(MNA)所判定的营养风险的预测因素及后果。
对MNA评分低(<24分)的受试者特征进行基线分析,并对这些低分的后果进行随访。
南澳大利亚。
250名居家护理客户(年龄67 - 99岁,173名女性)。
确定基线病史和营养状况。在12个月后的随访中获取有关住院情况的信息。
向营养不良的受试者的全科医生发送建议营养干预的信函。
在基线时,56.8%营养状况良好,38.4%存在营养不良风险,4.8%营养不良(43.2%营养状况不佳)。MNA评分低(<24分)的独立预测因素为独居以及36项简短健康调查问卷的身体和心理分量表。获得了240名受试者(96%)的随访信息。在随后的一年中,营养状况不佳的受试者比营养状况良好的受试者更有可能入院(风险比(RR)= 1.51,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.07 - 2.14)、有两次或更多次急诊入院(RR = 2.96,95% CI = 1.15 - 7.59)、住院时间超过4周(RR = 3.22,95% CI = 1.29 - 8.07)、跌倒(RR = 1.65,95% CI = 1.13 - 2.41)以及报告体重减轻(RR = 2.63,95% CI = 1.67 - 4.15)。
MNA识别出大量营养受损的受试者,这些受试者在接下来的一年中表现明显比营养良好的受试者差。需要开展研究以确定对MNA评分低的人群进行营养或其他干预是否能改善临床结局。