Professor Renuka Visvanathan, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Level 8B, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia,
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(3):271-280. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1145-y.
Older Australians prefer to live in their own homes for longer and reforms have attempted to increase the volume of home care packages (HCPs) accordingly but there remains a queue with the longer-term consequences unclear.
This study aims to characterise older Australians according to their wait times for a home care package (HCP), evaluate the association between wait time and mortality and evaluate the association between wait time and transition to permanent residential aged care services after HCP.
A retrospective cohort study using data from the National Historical cohort (2003-2014) of the Registry of Older South Australians (ROSA) was conducted.
Home based aged care services, national cohort.
Wait time was estimated from approval date to date of receiving a HCP. Descriptive, survival estimates (95% confidence intervals (CIs)), and multivariable survival analyses (Cox-regression) were conducted to evaluate the risk of mortality and transition to permanent residential aged care services by quartiles of wait time for HCP.
The cohort was followed for 4.0 years (interquartile range IQR (1.8-7.2)) and 38% were alive at the end of the study period with a median wait time for HCP of 62 (21-187) days. From 178,924 older people who received a HCP during the study period (2003-2013), 33.2% people received HCP within 30 days, 74.3% within 6 months and 25.7% after 6 months. The effect of wait time on risk of mortality was time-dependent, with longer wait times associated with higher mortality in the longer term. Compared to people who waited ≤30 days for a HCP, individuals who waited more than 6 months had an almost 20% excess risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 95%CI = (1.18, 1.16-1.21)) 2 years after entry into a HCP. Those who waited more than 6 months also had a 10% (1.10, 1.06-1.13) higher risk of transition to permanent residential aged care services after two years.
Prolonged wait times for HCP is associated with a higher risk of long-term mortality as well as transition to permanent residential aged care. It remains to be seen if a shortening of this wait time translates into better health outcomes.
澳大利亚老年人更愿意长期居住在自己家中,因此改革试图相应增加家庭护理包(HCP)的数量,但仍有一个队列,其长期后果尚不清楚。
本研究旨在根据等待家庭护理包(HCP)的时间来描述澳大利亚老年人的特征,评估等待时间与死亡率之间的关系,并评估等待时间与 HCP 后永久居住养老院服务之间的关系。
使用来自老年南澳大利亚人登记处(ROSA)国家历史队列(2003-2014 年)的数据进行回顾性队列研究。
家庭为基础的老年护理服务,全国队列。
等待时间从批准日期到接受 HCP 的日期进行估算。描述性、生存估计(95%置信区间(CI))和多变量生存分析(Cox 回归)用于评估 HCP 等待时间四分位数的死亡率和过渡到永久性居住养老院服务的风险。
该队列随访了 4.0 年(四分位距 IQR(1.8-7.2)),研究结束时有 38%的人存活,HCP 的中位等待时间为 62(21-187)天。在研究期间(2003-2013 年)接受 HCP 的 178924 名老年人中,33.2%的人在 30 天内接受 HCP,74.3%的人在 6 个月内接受 HCP,25.7%的人在 6 个月后接受 HCP。等待时间对死亡率的影响是时间依赖性的,随着等待时间的延长,长期死亡率更高。与等待 HCP 时间≤30 天的人相比,等待 HCP 时间超过 6 个月的人在进入 HCP 后 2 年内死亡的风险增加近 20%(调整后的危险比(aHR),95%CI=(1.18,1.16-1.21))。等待时间超过 6 个月的人在两年后过渡到永久性居住养老院服务的风险也增加了 10%(1.10,1.06-1.13)。
HCP 的长时间等待与长期死亡率以及过渡到永久性居住养老院服务的风险增加有关。等待时间的缩短是否会转化为更好的健康结果还有待观察。