Grange A
Department of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ann Trop Paediatr. 1992;12(4):353-8. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1992.11747599.
The efficacy and safety of malto-dextrin/glycine-based oral rehydration solution (ORS) when compared with the glucose-based oral rehydration solution (WHO) was evaluated in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Thirty-one subjects and 31 controls were studied. The mean values of the ORS intake, stool output, duration of diarrhoea, urine output, weight gain and serum electrolytes were comparable in both the study and the control groups (p > 0.05). It was found that the malto-dextrin/glycine ORS offered no therapeutic advantage over the standard glucose ORS (WHO). In view of the accidental preponderance of children of significantly lower nutritional status among the control group (p < 0.05), it is likely that the efficacy of malto-dextrin/glycine ORS might actually be less than that of the glucose ORS.
在一项随机双盲临床试验中,评估了与基于葡萄糖的口服补液盐(世界卫生组织标准)相比,基于麦芽糊精/甘氨酸的口服补液盐(ORS)的疗效和安全性。研究了31名受试者和31名对照。研究组和对照组在ORS摄入量、粪便排出量、腹泻持续时间、尿量、体重增加和血清电解质的平均值方面具有可比性(p>0.05)。发现麦芽糊精/甘氨酸ORS相对于标准葡萄糖ORS(世界卫生组织标准)没有治疗优势。鉴于对照组中营养状况明显较低的儿童意外占多数(p<0.05),麦芽糊精/甘氨酸ORS的疗效可能实际上低于葡萄糖ORS。