• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异常肾脏的体外冲击波碎石术:使用两代第二代碎石机的11年经验

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in anomalous kidneys: 11-year experience with two second-generation lithotripters.

作者信息

Sheir Khaled Z, Madbouly Khaled, Elsobky Emad, Abdelkhalek Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Urology. 2003 Jul;62(1):10-5; discussion 15-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00369-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00369-8
PMID:12837409
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To present our experience with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with anomalous kidneys and to determine the factors that may influence the stone-free rate in such patients.

METHODS

From February 1989 to February 2000, 198 patients were treated for urolithiasis in anomalous kidneys using ESWL. The mean patient age (SD) was 40.48 (11.53) years. The kidneys were horseshoe in 49 (24.7%), malrotated in 120 (60.6%), and duplex in 29 (14.7%). All patients were treated on an outpatient basis using two second-generation lithotripters (Dornier MFL 5000 and Toshiba Echolith). Pretreatment auxiliary measures were required in 6 patients (3%). Follow-up data were recorded at 3 months. The statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, with differences considered statistically significant if P <0.05.

RESULTS

The mean stone length (SD) was 13.54 (5.49) mm. The stones were single in 148 (74.7%), of new onset in 155 (78.3%), and on the right side in 82 (41.4%). All stones, but 5 (2.5%), were radiopaque. The overall stone-free rate was 72.2%. Neither the type of renal anomaly nor the type of lithotripter had any impact on the stone-free rate (P >0.05). Stone burden (length and number) had a significant influence on the stone-free rate (P <0.05). No extraordinary complications were recorded. Steinstrasse developed in 7 patients (3.5%). No deterioration of renal function or configuration was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

ESWL is safe and reliable for treatment of urolithiasis in anomalous kidneys. It should be the primary therapy when the stones are less than 20 mm. The ESWL outcome is comparable for normal and anomalous kidneys when the calculus size is considered.

摘要

目的

介绍我们在异位肾患者中进行体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的经验,并确定可能影响此类患者无石率的因素。

方法

1989年2月至2000年2月,198例异位肾尿路结石患者接受了ESWL治疗。患者平均年龄(标准差)为40.48(11.53)岁。其中马蹄肾49例(24.7%),旋转异常120例(60.6%),重复肾29例(14.7%)。所有患者均在门诊使用两台第二代碎石机(多尼尔MFL 5000和东芝Echolith)进行治疗。6例患者(3%)需要术前辅助措施。在3个月时记录随访数据。采用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼U检验进行统计学分析,P<0.05认为差异有统计学意义。

结果

结石平均长度(标准差)为13.54(5.49)mm。结石单发148例(74.7%),初发155例(78.3%),右侧82例(41.4%)。除5例(2.5%)外,所有结石均为不透X线结石。总体无石率为72.2%。肾脏异常类型和碎石机类型均对无石率无影响(P>0.05)。结石负荷(长度和数量)对无石率有显著影响(P<0.05)。未记录到特殊并发症。7例患者(3.5%)出现石街。未检测到肾功能或肾脏形态恶化。

结论

ESWL治疗异位肾尿路结石安全可靠。结石小于20mm时应作为首选治疗方法。考虑结石大小后,正常肾和异位肾的ESWL治疗效果相当。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in anomalous kidneys: 11-year experience with two second-generation lithotripters.异常肾脏的体外冲击波碎石术:使用两代第二代碎石机的11年经验
Urology. 2003 Jul;62(1):10-5; discussion 15-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00369-8.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: experience using two second-generation lithotripters.儿童体外冲击波碎石术:使用两种第二代碎石机的经验
BJU Int. 2000 Nov;86(7):851-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00899.x.
3
Stones in anomalous kidneys: results of treatment by shock wave lithotripsy in 150 patients.异位肾中的结石:150例患者冲击波碎石治疗结果
Int J Urol. 2004 Oct;11(10):831-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00916.x.
4
Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后成功率的预测——一种多变量分析模型
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(2):161-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590310022626.
5
[Treatment of lithiasis in horseshoe kidney with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy].[体外冲击波碎石术治疗马蹄肾结石]
Actas Urol Esp. 2001 Jan;25(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(01)72566-1.
6
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: a prospective study.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗异常肾肾结石: 一项前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0926-1. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
The role of ESWL in the treatment of calculi with anomalous kidneys.体外冲击波碎石术在治疗异位肾结石中的作用。
Eur Urol. 1997;31(3):302-4. doi: 10.1159/000474472.
8
Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.使用第三代体外冲击波碎石机的治疗效果和结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):972-81. doi: 10.1111/bju.12159.
9
Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089.
10
The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones.感染性结石体外冲击波碎石术单一疗法后残余碎片的转归
J Urol. 1991 Jan;145(1):6-9; discussion 9-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38230-7.

引用本文的文献

1
"Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus other treatments for stone management in horseshoe kidneys: A systematic review".经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与马蹄肾结石治疗的其他方法:一项系统评价
Arab J Urol. 2024 Feb 6;22(4):243-252. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2312699. eCollection 2024.
2
Challenges and options for management of stones in anomalous kidneys: a review of current literature.异位肾结石管理的挑战与选择:当前文献综述
Ther Adv Urol. 2023 Dec 24;15:17562872231217797. doi: 10.1177/17562872231217797. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?
在当今时代,经皮肾镜取石术还有一席之地吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 31;11(17):5157. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175157.
4
Laparoscopic Nephrolithotomy in a Horseshoe Kidney.马蹄肾的腹腔镜肾切开取石术
Cureus. 2020 Feb 25;12(2):e7099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7099.
5
Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in anomalous kidneys: a systematic review.异常肾输尿管镜取石术治疗结石病的结果:系统评价。
World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1135-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02810-x. Epub 2019 May 17.
6
Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?马蹄肾结石的不同治疗方法,结果有差异吗?
Urol Ann. 2018 Jul-Sep;10(3):287-290. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_116_17.
7
Stones in special situations.特殊情况下的结石。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1381-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2011-y. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: a prospective study.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗异常肾肾结石: 一项前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0926-1. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
9
Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients.冲击波碎石术(SWL)与逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗马蹄肾患者结石病的比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):96-100. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0023.
10
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a horseshoe kidney.马蹄肾的腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术
Turk J Urol. 2014 Dec;40(4):240-4. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.73604. Epub 2014 Oct 15.