Suppr超能文献

改善病情抗风湿药物治疗系统性硬化症的研究进展

Update on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of systemic sclerosis.

作者信息

Lin Antony T H, Clements Philip J, Furst Daniel E

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2003 May;29(2):409-26. doi: 10.1016/s0889-857x(03)00026-7.

Abstract

Treatment of systemic sclerosis has been somewhat haphazard and treatment has often been "borrowed" from the experience gained from treating other connective tissue diseases. There was a period of time that was focused mainly on organ-specific manifestations of systemic sclerosis and some advance in preventing vital organ damage (such as renal crisis) was achieved. The vast improvement in mortality from the use of ACE inhibitors raises one's hopes for other effective therapeutic interventions. At this juncture, the evidence is strong that the ACE inhibitors that are used in scleroderma renal crisis are disease-modifying, even without proving it by a randomized controlled trial. The evidence is strong that the use of epoprostenol for primary pulmonary hypertension is life-saving; however, whether epoprostenol is life-saving in the pulmonary hypertension in scleroderma remains to be proven. There are suggestions that bosentan (for the pulmonary hypertension of scleroderma), cyclophosphamide (for SSc alveolitis), stem cell transplant, interferon-gamma (for interstitial pulmonary fibrosis), and methotrexate (for the skin thickening of diffuse scleroderma) may improve organ function or functional activities, but whether they are truly disease-modifying remains to be proven. As we increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis and we learn how better to design trials for systemic sclerosis, we may be more successful in developing optimal disease-modifying therapy. Although the treatment of systemic sclerosis remains difficult, there are an increasing number of potentially effective regimens that are undergoing clinical investigations. A rational approach to therapy seems possible, based on a hypothesis of the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Thus, there is accumulating evidence that supports the use of prostacyclin derivatives to treat systemic sclerosis, some evidence that antifibrotic regimens may be effective, and moderate evidence that immunosuppression also may be effective in certain stages of this disease.

摘要

系统性硬化症的治疗一直有些随意,治疗方法常常是从治疗其他结缔组织疾病所积累的经验中“借鉴”而来。曾有一段时间主要关注系统性硬化症的器官特异性表现,并且在预防重要器官损害(如肾危象)方面取得了一些进展。使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂使死亡率大幅降低,这让人们对其他有效的治疗干预措施充满期待。在这一时刻,有充分证据表明用于硬皮病肾危象的ACE抑制剂具有改善病情的作用,即便尚未通过随机对照试验加以证实。有充分证据表明依前列醇用于治疗原发性肺动脉高压可挽救生命;然而,依前列醇对硬皮病相关肺动脉高压是否具有挽救生命的作用仍有待证实。有迹象表明波生坦(用于治疗硬皮病相关肺动脉高压)、环磷酰胺(用于治疗系统性硬化症相关肺泡炎)、干细胞移植、干扰素-γ(用于治疗间质性肺纤维化)以及甲氨蝶呤(用于治疗弥漫性硬皮病的皮肤增厚)可能改善器官功能或功能活动,但它们是否真的能改善病情仍有待证实。随着我们对系统性硬化症病理生理学的理解不断加深,以及学会如何更好地设计针对系统性硬化症的试验,我们在开发最佳改善病情疗法方面可能会更成功。尽管系统性硬化症的治疗仍然困难,但越来越多潜在有效的治疗方案正在进行临床研究。基于系统性硬化症发病机制的假设,一种合理的治疗方法似乎是可行的。因此,越来越多的证据支持使用前列环素衍生物治疗系统性硬化症,有一些证据表明抗纤维化方案可能有效,还有适度的证据表明免疫抑制在该病的某些阶段也可能有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验