Suppr超能文献

在选择性剥夺后,分离的脑干不支持快速眼动睡眠反弹。

The disconnected brain stem does not support rapid eye movement sleep rebound following selective deprivation.

作者信息

de Andrés Isabel, Garzón Miguel, Villablanca Jaime R

机构信息

Departamento de Morfología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sleep. 2003 Jun 15;26(4):419-25. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.4.419.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the brain stem can independently support the processes of rapid eye movement sleep rebound and pressure that follow deprivation.

DESIGN

Cats with a brain-stem separation from the forebrain were compared to intact subjects on their response to rapid eye movement sleep deprivation.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight adult mongrel cats of both sexes.

INTERVENTIONS

All cats had electrodes implanted for polygraphic recordings, and 4 subjects sustained a mesencephalic transection. Weeks later, a 24-hour undisturbed sleep-wakefulness recording session was performed, and the next day, a similar session started with a 6-hour deprivation period, which was followed by 18 hours of undisturbed sleep.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Deprivation produced 90.1% and 87.8 % losses of rapid eye movement sleep time in intact and decerebrate cats, respectively. However, no significant changes in non-rapid eye movement sleep, drowsiness, or waking time percentages were seen in either group of animals when comparing the 6-hour time blocks of the deprivation and baseline sessions, indicating selective rapid eye movement sleep deprivation. During the 6-hour block following deprivation, rapid eye movement sleep time increased a significant 34.6% in intact cats while, in contrast, there was no rapid eye movement sleep rebound in decerebrate animals. The number of aborted episodes of rapid eye movement sleep during deprivation exceeded the number of episodes during the same period of the baseline day by 3 and 5 folds in intact and decerebrate cats, respectively, indicating an increase in rapid eye movement sleep pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Rebound in rapid eye movement sleep after deprivation cannot be sustained by the brain stem alone; in contrast, rapid eye movement sleep pressure persisted in the decerebrate cat, demonstrating that this process does not depend on descending forebrain influences. This indicates that rebound and pressure are 2 different components of the recovery process after rapid eye movement sleep deprivation and that, as such, are likely controlled by different mechanisms.

摘要

研究目的

确定脑干是否能独立支持快速眼动睡眠剥夺后的快速眼动睡眠反弹及压力过程。

设计

将脑干与前脑分离的猫与完整的实验对象在对快速眼动睡眠剥夺的反应上进行比较。

参与者

8只成年杂种猫,雌雄皆有。

干预措施

所有猫均植入电极用于多导睡眠图记录,4只实验对象进行了中脑横断。数周后,进行了一次24小时不受干扰的睡眠-觉醒记录,次日,进行了一次类似的记录,开始是6小时的剥夺期,随后是18小时不受干扰的睡眠。

测量与结果

剥夺分别使完整猫和去大脑猫的快速眼动睡眠时间减少了90.1%和87.8%。然而,在比较剥夺期和基线期的6小时时间段时,两组动物的非快速眼动睡眠、嗜睡或清醒时间百分比均未出现显著变化,表明是选择性快速眼动睡眠剥夺。在剥夺后的6小时时间段内,完整猫的快速眼动睡眠时间显著增加了34.6%,而相比之下,去大脑动物没有快速眼动睡眠反弹。在剥夺期间,完整猫和去大脑猫的快速眼动睡眠中断发作次数分别比基线日同期增加了3倍和5倍,表明快速眼动睡眠压力增加。

结论

剥夺后的快速眼动睡眠反弹不能仅由脑干维持;相比之下,去大脑猫的快速眼动睡眠压力持续存在,表明该过程不依赖于前脑的下行影响。这表明反弹和压力是快速眼动睡眠剥夺后恢复过程的两个不同组成部分,因此可能由不同机制控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验