Cruickshank J M
Royal Brompton, National Heart and Chest Hospital, Cheshire, England.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;20 Suppl 11:S55-69. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199200111-00010.
Coronary heart disease is the most frequent cause of death in Western, industrialized countries. Coronary risk factors are prevalent in such countries and sometimes combine to constitute the so-called syndrome X--hypertension, central obesity, serum lipid and clotting disturbances, and insulin resistance. beta-Blockers, unlike calcium antagonists, have proved highly effective in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. If present at the time of the myocardial infarction, beta-blockers (unlike calcium antagonists and diuretics) probably decrease mortality 1 month later. Early intervention (within 12 h) of chest pain with intravenous beta-blockers results in a 15% reduction in cardiovascular mortality at 1 week. Later intervention (3-28 days) with oral non-ISA beta-blockers results in a 30% reduction in mortality after 1 year; ISA-containing beta-blockers are probably less effective (less decrease in heart rate). Hydrophilicity/lipophilicity of beta-blockers is unimportant in terms of decreased mortality. Primary prevention of myocardial infarction, unlike stroke, in hypertensive patients has been disappointing, possibly due to treatment-induced biochemical/lipid changes or inappropriate lowering of diastolic blood pressure in high-risk subjects (J-curve effect). beta-Blockers should be first-line therapy for hypertensive patients up to the age of 65 years, particularly men (and nonsmokers) as Q-wave myocardial infarction is significantly decreased by beta-blockers and significantly increased by diuretics. However, in elderly hypertensive subjects, beta-blockers have not significantly decreased myocardial infarction (unlike stroke), whereas diuretics have. The effects of beta-blockers and diuretics on heart size (and thus coronary flow reserve) in the elderly may be important. Thus, beta-blockers should be second-line therapy for the elderly hypertensive individual but first-line if overt ischemia (e.g., angina or recent myocardial infarction) also is present. In patients with angina but normal blood pressure, beta-blockers tend to decrease and calcium antagonists increase cardiovascular events. Thus, beta-blockers are highly effective agents in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction and are moderately effective in primary prevention of myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients (particularly men) under the age of 65 years.
冠心病是西方工业化国家最常见的死亡原因。冠心病危险因素在这些国家普遍存在,有时会共同构成所谓的X综合征——高血压、中心性肥胖、血脂和凝血紊乱以及胰岛素抵抗。与钙拮抗剂不同,β受体阻滞剂已被证明在心肌梗死的二级预防中非常有效。如果在心肌梗死发生时使用β受体阻滞剂(与钙拮抗剂和利尿剂不同),可能会降低1个月后的死亡率。静脉注射β受体阻滞剂对胸痛进行早期干预(12小时内)可使1周时心血管死亡率降低15%。后期使用口服非ISAβ受体阻滞剂进行干预(3 - 28天)可使1年后死亡率降低30%;含ISA的β受体阻滞剂可能效果较差(心率降低较少)。就死亡率降低而言,β受体阻滞剂的亲水性/亲脂性并不重要。与中风不同,高血压患者心肌梗死的一级预防一直令人失望,这可能是由于治疗引起的生化/脂质变化或高危人群舒张压降低不当(J曲线效应)。β受体阻滞剂应作为65岁以下高血压患者的一线治疗药物,特别是男性(和不吸烟者),因为β受体阻滞剂可显著降低Q波心肌梗死的发生率,而利尿剂则会使其显著增加。然而,在老年高血压患者中,β受体阻滞剂并未显著降低心肌梗死的发生率(与中风不同),而利尿剂则有此作用。β受体阻滞剂和利尿剂对老年人心脏大小(进而对冠状动脉血流储备)的影响可能很重要。因此,β受体阻滞剂应作为老年高血压患者的二线治疗药物,但如果同时存在明显缺血(如心绞痛或近期心肌梗死)则应作为一线药物。在血压正常但患有心绞痛的患者中,β受体阻滞剂往往会减少心血管事件,而钙拮抗剂则会增加。因此,β受体阻滞剂在心肌梗死的二级预防中非常有效,在65岁以下高血压患者(特别是男性)心肌梗死的一级预防中也有一定效果。